Health literacy and access to health services: insights from a national survey in Italy

Abstract Background Health Literacy (HL) entails accessing, understanding, evaluating, and applying healthcare (HC) information. Aim of this study is to assess HL association with HC services use in the Italian adult population. Methods A national survey was conducted in Italy in 2021, in the framework of the WHO network Measuring Population and Organizational Health Literacy (M-POHL). A validated questionnaire was administered to a representative sample of the Italian resident population aged 18+ years (N = 3,500). A 4-point Likert scale was used for answers: very easy, easy, difficult, very difficult. The HL index, as the percentage of very easy/easy responses, was categorized as Inadequate (0-50%), Problematic (51-66%), Sufficient (67-80%), Excellent (81-100%). Inadequate/Problematic were combined in ‘Limiting’ and Sufficient/Excellent in ‘Not limiting’ categories. A multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted by sex, age, geographical area, education, and financial deprivation, was used to explore the associations between HL and the frequency, of utilization of general practitioners-GPs (never, once/twice, three/more times), medical or surgical specialist services-MSS (never, once, twice/more), inpatient hospital services-IHS (never, once/more), day-patient hospital services-DPS (never, once/more), taking sick days at work-SD (never, once/twice, three/more) in the last 12 months, and emergency services-ES (never, once/more) in the last 24 months. Results In Limiting HL (64.6%), the prevalence of never using ES is significantly lower compared to Not limiting HL (81.83% vs 83.80%); likewise for never using MSS (45.84% vs 51.24%) and never using DPS (90.87% vs 93.80%). Significant association with Limiting HL was found for using MSS once (Odds Ratio-OR=1.55), twice/more (OR = 1.76) and taking SD once/twice (OR = 1.58). Conclusions Results demonstrate that people using HC services more frequently, in particular MSS and taking SD, require dedicated support to improve HL. Key messages • This study aims to evaluate the association of the individual Health literacy level with the use of several healthcare services in the Italian adult population. • ‘Limiting’ Health Literacy is associated with using medical or surgical specialist services twice or more times and taking sick days at work once or twice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1676
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health literacy and access to health services: insights from a national survey in Italy

Brigid Unim, Chiara Donfrancesco, Patrizio Zanobini, Cinzia Lo Noce et al.
3 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.55
article

Health literacy and access to health services: insights from a national survey in Italy

Brigid Unim, Chiara Donfrancesco, Patrizio Zanobini, Cinzia Lo Noce, Daniela Galeone, A Rosano, Chiara Lorini, Luigi Palmieri, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi, B Marcozzi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Health Literacy (HL) entails accessing, understanding, evaluating, and applying healthcare (HC) information. Aim of this study is to assess HL association with HC services use in the Italian adult population. Methods A national survey was conducted in Italy in 2021, in the framework of the WHO network Measuring Population and Organizational Health Literacy (M-POHL). A validated questionnaire was administered to a representative sample of the Italian resident population aged 18+ years (N = 3,500). A 4-point Likert scale was used for answers: very easy, easy, difficult, very difficult. The HL index, as the percentage of very easy/easy responses, was categorized as Inadequate (0-50%), Problematic (51-66%), Sufficient (67-80%), Excellent (81-100%). Inadequate/Problematic were combined in ‘Limiting’ and Sufficient/Excellent in ‘Not limiting’ categories. A multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted by sex, age, geographical area, education, and financial deprivation, was used to explore the associations between HL and the frequency, of utilization of general practitioners-GPs (never, once/twice, three/more times), medical or surgical specialist services-MSS (never, once, twice/more), inpatient hospital services-IHS (never, once/more), day-patient hospital services-DPS (never, once/more), taking sick days at work-SD (never, once/twice, three/more) in the last 12 months, and emergency services-ES (never, once/more) in the last 24 months. Results In Limiting HL (64.6%), the prevalence of never using ES is significantly lower compared to Not limiting HL (81.83% vs 83.80%); likewise for never using MSS (45.84% vs 51.24%) and never using DPS (90.87% vs 93.80%). Significant association with Limiting HL was found for using MSS once (Odds Ratio-OR=1.55), twice/more (OR = 1.76) and taking SD once/twice (OR = 1.58). Conclusions Results demonstrate that people using HC services more frequently, in particular MSS and taking SD, require dedicated support to improve HL. Key messages • This study aims to evaluate the association of the individual Health literacy level with the use of several healthcare services in the Italian adult population. • ‘Limiting’ Health Literacy is associated with using medical or surgical specialist services twice or more times and taking sick days at work once or twice.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Ministero della Salute (IT), National Institute for Public Policy (US), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.