Monitoring inequities using routine administrative data: a case study of cancer screening in Ontario, Canada

Abstract Routine cancer screening is a critical primary care service to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality, through early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. We evaluated longitudinal changes in socioeconomic inequities in cancer screening in Ontario, Canada, by using linked provincial health administrative databases including 15.9 million records eligible for cancer screening. The rate of colorectal cancer screening increased between 2011 and 2020 (54% to 62%) with a reduction in the indices of inequity (slope index, SII: from 0.36 to 0.33; relative index of inequity, RII: from 0.69 to 0.54). However, the rate of cervical cancer screening decreased (from 76% to 68%), particularly in deprived areas (RII increasing from 0.47 to 0.54). Access to cancer screening is a challenge in deprived areas. Understanding the socio-economic determinants in access to screening across the life course can help develop tailored interventions to increase health equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.760
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring inequities using routine administrative data: a case study of cancer screening in Ontario, Canada

Saverio Stranges
European Journal of Public Health
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Monitoring inequities using routine administrative data: a case study of cancer screening in Ontario, Canada

Saverio Stranges
article en

Abstract

Abstract Routine cancer screening is a critical primary care service to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality, through early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. We evaluated longitudinal changes in socioeconomic inequities in cancer screening in Ontario, Canada, by using linked provincial health administrative databases including 15.9 million records eligible for cancer screening. The rate of colorectal cancer screening increased between 2011 and 2020 (54% to 62%) with a reduction in the indices of inequity (slope index, SII: from 0.36 to 0.33; relative index of inequity, RII: from 0.69 to 0.54). However, the rate of cervical cancer screening decreased (from 76% to 68%), particularly in deprived areas (RII increasing from 0.47 to 0.54). Access to cancer screening is a challenge in deprived areas. Understanding the socio-economic determinants in access to screening across the life course can help develop tailored interventions to increase health equity.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Western University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Monitoring inequities using routine administrative data: a case study of cancer screening in Ontario, Canada — Saverio Stranges · European Journal of Public Health (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS