The role of class stigma in socioeconomic inequalities in type 2 diabetes: The Maastricht Study

Abstract Background Low socioeconomic position (SEP) is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). An underlying mechanism behind socioeconomic health inequalities can be stigma, particularly classism. Studying the influence of class stigma in the context of (pre)diabetes and socioeconomic inequalities may shed light on the societal factors influencing diabetes. Methods Data from 1947 participants aged 49-88 who participated in the second phase of The Maastricht Study starting between November 2020 and April 2023 were used. SEP (education, income, occupation) and 6-item classism scale were measured through self-reported questionnaires. (Pre)diabetes was measured through an oral glucose tolerance test. We conducted multinomial logistic regression analyses to investigate the associations between SEP, classism, and diabetes status. Results 20.9% (N = 406) of the study sample had T2DM (Mage=69.8(±6.8) years; 31.3% women). People with low SEP had more often T2DM (e.g., income OR = 2.13, 95%CI:1.54-2.82) and reported perceived classism (e.g., education OR = 2.07, 95%CI:1.33-3.21) than people with high SEP. Classism was not statistically significantly associated with T2DM (OR = 0.78, 95%CI:0.48-1.29). Conclusions Social health inequalities are apparent in T2DM; however, our results suggest that class stigma might not be a major factor in underlying processes. Further research can investigate the role of chronic stress and intersection of multiple stigmas. Key messages • The underlying factors behind socioeconomic health disparities are complex. Social and psychological environment in low SEP should be investigated carefully. • Although low SEP is strongly associated with T2DM and perceived classism, class stigma might not be a major target in explaining socioeconomic pathways in diabetes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1389
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of class stigma in socioeconomic inequalities in type 2 diabetes: The Maastricht Study

BASTIAAN E. DE GALAN, Pieter C. Dagnelie, Marleen M. J. van Greevenbroek, Rachelle Meisters et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

The role of class stigma in socioeconomic inequalities in type 2 diabetes: The Maastricht Study

BASTIAAN E. DE GALAN, Pieter C. Dagnelie, Marleen M. J. van Greevenbroek, Rachelle Meisters, Miranda T. Schram, Hans Bosma, Carla Kallen, Annemarie Koster, Bengisu Sezer, J. Albers
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Low socioeconomic position (SEP) is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). An underlying mechanism behind socioeconomic health inequalities can be stigma, particularly classism. Studying the influence of class stigma in the context of (pre)diabetes and socioeconomic inequalities may shed light on the societal factors influencing diabetes. Methods Data from 1947 participants aged 49-88 who participated in the second phase of The Maastricht Study starting between November 2020 and April 2023 were used. SEP (education, income, occupation) and 6-item classism scale were measured through self-reported questionnaires. (Pre)diabetes was measured through an oral glucose tolerance test. We conducted multinomial logistic regression analyses to investigate the associations between SEP, classism, and diabetes status. Results 20.9% (N = 406) of the study sample had T2DM (Mage=69.8(±6.8) years; 31.3% women). People with low SEP had more often T2DM (e.g., income OR = 2.13, 95%CI:1.54-2.82) and reported perceived classism (e.g., education OR = 2.07, 95%CI:1.33-3.21) than people with high SEP. Classism was not statistically significantly associated with T2DM (OR = 0.78, 95%CI:0.48-1.29). Conclusions Social health inequalities are apparent in T2DM; however, our results suggest that class stigma might not be a major factor in underlying processes. Further research can investigate the role of chronic stress and intersection of multiple stigmas. Key messages • The underlying factors behind socioeconomic health disparities are complex. Social and psychological environment in low SEP should be investigated carefully. • Although low SEP is strongly associated with T2DM and perceived classism, class stigma might not be a major target in explaining socioeconomic pathways in diabetes.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University Medical Center (US), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.