A comparison of machine learning methods for queue length detection

Queues are formed by people waiting for a service in public institutions and they can be defined as orderly groups of people. Automatically counting the number of people waiting in a queue through video camera footage would provide these institutions with valuable information with regards to customer service quality. In this paper, our goal is to compare several machine learning methods for finding the total number of people waiting in a queue given video camera frames. We approached this problem as a regression task. We used a subset of the Collective Activity Dataset and compared three different methods. The first two methods used bounding box coordinates and orientations provided by the dataset, while the last method utilized the bounding box coordinates to extract feature maps from the frames using RoiAlign. The first method used XGBoost, while the latter methods used Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Results show that the method using RoiAlign presents the best prediction performance in terms of mean squared error and mean absolute error, compared to other methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33769/aupse.1415447
Primary Topic
Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of machine learning methods for queue length detection

Mehmet Serdar Güzel, Ebru Akçapınar Sezer, Mehmet Eren Yeşilyurt
Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering
Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
article

A comparison of machine learning methods for queue length detection

Mehmet Serdar Güzel, Ebru Akçapınar Sezer, Mehmet Eren Yeşilyurt
article en

Abstract

Queues are formed by people waiting for a service in public institutions and they can be defined as orderly groups of people. Automatically counting the number of people waiting in a queue through video camera footage would provide these institutions with valuable information with regards to customer service quality. In this paper, our goal is to compare several machine learning methods for finding the total number of people waiting in a queue given video camera frames. We approached this problem as a regression task. We used a subset of the Collective Activity Dataset and compared three different methods. The first two methods used bounding box coordinates and orientations provided by the dataset, while the last method utilized the bounding box coordinates to extract feature maps from the frames using RoiAlign. The first method used XGBoost, while the latter methods used Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Results show that the method using RoiAlign presents the best prediction performance in terms of mean squared error and mean absolute error, compared to other methods.

Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and EngineeringVol. 66(2)
Ankara University (TR), Hacettepe University (TR), Kastamonu University (TR)
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparison of machine learning methods for queue length detection — Mehmet Serdar Güzel, Ebru Akçapınar Sezer, et al. · Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS