Utilization patterns and preferences of telemedicine services in the post-Covid-19 era in Israel

Abstract Background While telemedicine can streamline healthcare delivery, suboptimal use may compromise care quality and access. Given the increased adoption of these services during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, understanding best practices through examination of utilization patterns and patient preferences is crucial. This study estimated utilization rates, patient preferences and perceptions of response received for different physician-encounter channels for common clinical and administrative scenarios. Methods Cross-sectional telephone survey in Hebrew or Arabic of 519 Israelis who contacted a doctor in the past year for clinical or administrative needs. Data collected during April-June 2023, focused on chosen contact channel, reasons for choice, perceived response adequacy, and hypothetical future preferences. Findings 78% of encounters with family physician for clinical need were in-person, with lower rates for phone (16%) or messaging (6%); in-person dominated with encounters with specialists (94%). Conversely, for administrative needs, more used phone (15%) or messaging (48%), though 37% still preferred in-person encounter. Video usage was negligible (<1%). Main reasons for in-person choice were perceived need for physical exam, habit, or negative perception of remote service quality. Convenience/exam-free needs drove phone/messaging use. While most patients were satisfied with their chosen channels, phone consultations had lower future preference rates. Conclusions Matching channel to need is crucial. Physical exams require in-person visits, though they are not always required and many stick with in-person out of habit; remote options like messaging can streamline administrative tasks. Patient education could address habits and help familiarize patients with new options. Optimizing phone visits and promoting video options could enhance adoption due to their benefits. Key messages • In-person visits are preferred for clinical needs, while messaging/phone are underutilized for administrative tasks, highlighting missed opportunities for convenient telemedicine options. • Addressing patient habits and perceptions around remote healthcare channels is crucial for optimizing telemedicine adoption and streamlining care delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1649
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilization patterns and preferences of telemedicine services in the post-Covid-19 era in Israel

Arnona Ziv, Rachel Wilf‐Miron, Vicki Myers, T Norman et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
0.54
article

Utilization patterns and preferences of telemedicine services in the post-Covid-19 era in Israel

Arnona Ziv, Rachel Wilf‐Miron, Vicki Myers, T Norman, H Samuel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background While telemedicine can streamline healthcare delivery, suboptimal use may compromise care quality and access. Given the increased adoption of these services during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, understanding best practices through examination of utilization patterns and patient preferences is crucial. This study estimated utilization rates, patient preferences and perceptions of response received for different physician-encounter channels for common clinical and administrative scenarios. Methods Cross-sectional telephone survey in Hebrew or Arabic of 519 Israelis who contacted a doctor in the past year for clinical or administrative needs. Data collected during April-June 2023, focused on chosen contact channel, reasons for choice, perceived response adequacy, and hypothetical future preferences. Findings 78% of encounters with family physician for clinical need were in-person, with lower rates for phone (16%) or messaging (6%); in-person dominated with encounters with specialists (94%). Conversely, for administrative needs, more used phone (15%) or messaging (48%), though 37% still preferred in-person encounter. Video usage was negligible (<1%). Main reasons for in-person choice were perceived need for physical exam, habit, or negative perception of remote service quality. Convenience/exam-free needs drove phone/messaging use. While most patients were satisfied with their chosen channels, phone consultations had lower future preference rates. Conclusions Matching channel to need is crucial. Physical exams require in-person visits, though they are not always required and many stick with in-person out of habit; remote options like messaging can streamline administrative tasks. Patient education could address habits and help familiarize patients with new options. Optimizing phone visits and promoting video options could enhance adoption due to their benefits. Key messages • In-person visits are preferred for clinical needs, while messaging/phone are underutilized for administrative tasks, highlighting missed opportunities for convenient telemedicine options. • Addressing patient habits and perceptions around remote healthcare channels is crucial for optimizing telemedicine adoption and streamlining care delivery.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Sheba Medical Center (IL), Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute (IL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.