Molecular docking, DFT and antiproliferative properties of 4‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)−3‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)−1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐b]pyridine as potent anticancer agent with CDK2 and PIM1 inhibition potency

Due to the limited effeteness and safety concerns associated with current cancer treatments, there is a pressing need to develop novel therapeutic agents. 4-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine (3) was synthesized and Initially screened on 59 cancer cell lines showed promising anticancer activity, so, it was chosen for a 5-dose experiment by the NCI/USA. The GI<sub>50</sub> values ranged from 1.04 to 8.02 μM on the entire nine panels (57 cell lines), with a GI<sub>50</sub> of 2.70 μM for (MG-MID) panel, indicating an encouraging action. To further explore the molecular attributes of compound 3, we optimized its structure using DFT with the B3LYP/6-31 + + G(d,p) basis set. We have considered vibrational analysis, bond lengths and angles, FMOs, and MEP for the structure. Additionally, pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted using various in-silico platforms to evaluate the compound safety. A molecular modeling study created a kinase profile on 44 different kinases. This allowed us to study our compound's binding affinity to these kinases and compare it to the co-crystallized one. Our findings revealed compound 3 exhibited better binding for half of the tested kinases, suggesting its potential as a multi-kinase inhibitor. To further validate our computational results, we tested compound 3 for its inhibitory effects on CDK2 and PIM1. Compound 3 exhibited an IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.30 µM for CDK2 inhibition, making it five times less active than Roscovitine, which has an IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.06 µM. However, compound 3 demonstrated slightly better inhibition of PIM1 compared to Staurosporine. These findings suggest that compound 3 is a promising anticancer agent with the potential for further development into a highly active compound.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Development Research
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.70009
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Molecular docking, DFT and antiproliferative properties of 4‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)−3‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)−1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐b]pyridine as potent anticancer agent with CDK2 and PIM1 inhibition potency

Mohamed K. Elgohary, Alaa A.‐M. Abdel‐Aziz, Faizah A. Binjubair, Sara T. Al‐Rashood et al.
8 citations
Drug Development Research
Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
3.40
article

Molecular docking, DFT and antiproliferative properties of 4‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)−3‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)−1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐b]pyridine as potent anticancer agent with CDK2 and PIM1 inhibition potency

Mohamed K. Elgohary, Alaa A.‐M. Abdel‐Aziz, Faizah A. Binjubair, Sara T. Al‐Rashood, Hatem A. Abdel‐Aziz, Basma S. Almansour, Mahmoud S. Elkotamy, Noha I. Ziedan
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Due to the limited effeteness and safety concerns associated with current cancer treatments, there is a pressing need to develop novel therapeutic agents. 4-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine (3) was synthesized and Initially screened on 59 cancer cell lines showed promising anticancer activity, so, it was chosen for a 5-dose experiment by the NCI/USA. The GI<sub>50</sub> values ranged from 1.04 to 8.02 μM on the entire nine panels (57 cell lines), with a GI<sub>50</sub> of 2.70 μM for (MG-MID) panel, indicating an encouraging action. To further explore the molecular attributes of compound 3, we optimized its structure using DFT with the B3LYP/6-31 + + G(d,p) basis set. We have considered vibrational analysis, bond lengths and angles, FMOs, and MEP for the structure. Additionally, pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted using various in-silico platforms to evaluate the compound safety. A molecular modeling study created a kinase profile on 44 different kinases. This allowed us to study our compound's binding affinity to these kinases and compare it to the co-crystallized one. Our findings revealed compound 3 exhibited better binding for half of the tested kinases, suggesting its potential as a multi-kinase inhibitor. To further validate our computational results, we tested compound 3 for its inhibitory effects on CDK2 and PIM1. Compound 3 exhibited an IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.30 µM for CDK2 inhibition, making it five times less active than Roscovitine, which has an IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.06 µM. However, compound 3 demonstrated slightly better inhibition of PIM1 compared to Staurosporine. These findings suggest that compound 3 is a promising anticancer agent with the potential for further development into a highly active compound.

Drug Development ResearchVol. 85(7)
Suez Canal University (EG), University of Chester (GB), Pharos University in Alexandria (EG), King Saud University (SA), National Research Centre (EG), Egyptian Russian University (EG)
King Saud University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.