A questionnaire to assess ecoanxiety and its sociodemographic determinants among Italian adolescents

Abstract Background Climate change poses serious challenges to Public Health, including mental health impacts. In Italy, few studies investigated the rise of eco-anxiety, especially among adolescents, who are the main group affected by this feeling. Specific measurement tools for this population are needed to fill this gap. The aim is to adapt the Italian version of the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS) to adolescents, and pair it with a socioeconomic and demographic questionnaire (SDQ) to assess determinants. Methods The Italian CCAS was modified for adolescents through a process involving a literature review, expert discussions, and a pretest. This adapted version (a-CCAS) was tested with individuals aged 14-18 years old, maintaining an ideal ratio of 10 respondents per item. Extant psychometric scales were utilized to assess its validity. The SDQ was developed from results of a systematic review of known associations between socioeconomic and demographic factors and eco-anxiety in youth, and expert discussions, and validated by piloting the SDQ with another sample of adolescents. Internal consistency of the a-CCAS and SDQ was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha (Cα). Results The a-CCAS kept most of its original content, comprising 13 items and 2 subscales: cognitive and functional impairment. Pilot respondents were 162; Cα coefficient was >0.7 for both subscales. Convergent and concurrent validity showed positive correlations with the extant scales. The SDQ comprised 12 items in 3 domains: family, social and political-environmental determinants. Respondents were 47 and Cα coefficient was >0.7. Conclusions The a-CCAS and SDQ are valid tools for assessing baseline eco-anxiety and its determinants in Italian adolescents and can contribute to Public Health efforts to reduce the climate-related mental health burden, by measuring the impact of specific educational interventions about climate change targeted at the young. This questionnaire was created as part of the PRIN P2022JJ3LB project. Key messages • These results contribute to filling an evidence gap on eco-anxiety and its socioeconomic and demographic determinants among Italian adolescents by providing researchers with a valid measurement tool. • This tool holds promise for assessing the impact of psychologically-informed educational interventions about climate change and adaptive coping strategies on adolescents’ eco-anxiety levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1364
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A questionnaire to assess ecoanxiety and its sociodemographic determinants among Italian adolescents

Doris Zjalic, Gaia Surya Lombardi, Massimo Innocenti, Alessio Perilli et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
article

A questionnaire to assess ecoanxiety and its sociodemographic determinants among Italian adolescents

Doris Zjalic, Gaia Surya Lombardi, Massimo Innocenti, Alessio Perilli, Elı́as Campo, L Nachira, G Congedo, Giulia Fioravanti, Stefania Bruno, M Di Russo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Climate change poses serious challenges to Public Health, including mental health impacts. In Italy, few studies investigated the rise of eco-anxiety, especially among adolescents, who are the main group affected by this feeling. Specific measurement tools for this population are needed to fill this gap. The aim is to adapt the Italian version of the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS) to adolescents, and pair it with a socioeconomic and demographic questionnaire (SDQ) to assess determinants. Methods The Italian CCAS was modified for adolescents through a process involving a literature review, expert discussions, and a pretest. This adapted version (a-CCAS) was tested with individuals aged 14-18 years old, maintaining an ideal ratio of 10 respondents per item. Extant psychometric scales were utilized to assess its validity. The SDQ was developed from results of a systematic review of known associations between socioeconomic and demographic factors and eco-anxiety in youth, and expert discussions, and validated by piloting the SDQ with another sample of adolescents. Internal consistency of the a-CCAS and SDQ was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha (Cα). Results The a-CCAS kept most of its original content, comprising 13 items and 2 subscales: cognitive and functional impairment. Pilot respondents were 162; Cα coefficient was >0.7 for both subscales. Convergent and concurrent validity showed positive correlations with the extant scales. The SDQ comprised 12 items in 3 domains: family, social and political-environmental determinants. Respondents were 47 and Cα coefficient was >0.7. Conclusions The a-CCAS and SDQ are valid tools for assessing baseline eco-anxiety and its determinants in Italian adolescents and can contribute to Public Health efforts to reduce the climate-related mental health burden, by measuring the impact of specific educational interventions about climate change targeted at the young. This questionnaire was created as part of the PRIN P2022JJ3LB project. Key messages • These results contribute to filling an evidence gap on eco-anxiety and its socioeconomic and demographic determinants among Italian adolescents by providing researchers with a valid measurement tool. • This tool holds promise for assessing the impact of psychologically-informed educational interventions about climate change and adaptive coping strategies on adolescents’ eco-anxiety levels.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Cambia (AU), Associazione Italiana Arbitri (IT), Institute for Reproductive Health (US), University of Florence (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.