Implementation of polygenic risk scores in secondary prevention of (breast) cancer

Abstract Utilizing polygenic risk scores to inform secondary prevention of breast cancer via population screening programs is one of the pioneering applications of genomics in public health applications. Over the last decade, polygenic risk scores for breast cancer have been developed and validated in various European populations (AUC ± 0.63, OR per Z unit ± 1.6, depending on the population). In some countries, the polygenic risk score has been integrated with decision modeling tools, such as CanRisk in the Netherlands, and low-level implementation into health and care systems has started. Implementation strategies vary, but generally consider initial implementation into high-risk populations, such as breast cancer families, in specialized clinical setting, such as academic medical centres, or specialized cancer clinics, referring relatives of patients to population screening based on comprehensive risk modelling, including polygenic risk scores. This route may be followed by other disease fields as well. The presentations outlines the current evidence and considerations on breast cancer genetic risk modelling, clinical pilot studies and the outline of step-wise implementation of such models to benefit secondary prevention programs. We start from the perspective of a single hospital, to the needed steps to upscale to national populations, both in diversity of these populations, as the throughput of genetic testing and counselling, until the harmonization and recalibration of various European healthcare models. We draw from examples of the Genotyping on all patients (GOALL), building cancer health platforms (CanHeal) and Genome of Europe (GoE) consortia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.777
Primary Topic
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of polygenic risk scores in secondary prevention of (breast) cancer

Frank J.A. van Rooij
European Journal of Public Health
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
article

Implementation of polygenic risk scores in secondary prevention of (breast) cancer

Frank J.A. van Rooij
article en

Abstract

Abstract Utilizing polygenic risk scores to inform secondary prevention of breast cancer via population screening programs is one of the pioneering applications of genomics in public health applications. Over the last decade, polygenic risk scores for breast cancer have been developed and validated in various European populations (AUC ± 0.63, OR per Z unit ± 1.6, depending on the population). In some countries, the polygenic risk score has been integrated with decision modeling tools, such as CanRisk in the Netherlands, and low-level implementation into health and care systems has started. Implementation strategies vary, but generally consider initial implementation into high-risk populations, such as breast cancer families, in specialized clinical setting, such as academic medical centres, or specialized cancer clinics, referring relatives of patients to population screening based on comprehensive risk modelling, including polygenic risk scores. This route may be followed by other disease fields as well. The presentations outlines the current evidence and considerations on breast cancer genetic risk modelling, clinical pilot studies and the outline of step-wise implementation of such models to benefit secondary prevention programs. We start from the perspective of a single hospital, to the needed steps to upscale to national populations, both in diversity of these populations, as the throughput of genetic testing and counselling, until the harmonization and recalibration of various European healthcare models. We draw from examples of the Genotyping on all patients (GOALL), building cancer health platforms (CanHeal) and Genome of Europe (GoE) consortia.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Erasmus MC (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.