Past trends and future projections of psychological distress among general population in Finland

Abstract Introduction The aim was to examine past and future trends of psychological distress in Finland from 2013 to 2040. Methods Six representative cross-sectional surveys from the years 2013, 2014, 2015, 2018, 2020, and 2022 (N = 172,547, aged 20+ y) were used. Multiple imputation was used in projecting psychological distress (MHI-5, with cut-off value ≤60). As the COVID-19 pandemic had a strong effect on psychological distress which persisted after the pandemic, projections were made with and without data from the years 2020 and 2022. Results The prevalence of psychological distress was slightly declining during the period 2013-2018 for both men and women, ending up around 18% for men and 19% for women. When including the years 2020 and 2022, however, trends showed a steep increase in the prevalence of psychological distress during 2018-2022. Among 20-39-year-olds, the prevalence of psychological distress increased 9.8%-points over the four-year period. Similarly, among 40-54-year-olds, an 8.2%-points increase was observed. In older age groups (55-64, 65-74 and 75 years and older) psychological distress first increased from 2018 to 2020 but then plateaued especially among the oldest. Projections based on the observed past trends during the period 2013-2018 showed a steady decline in psychological distress, the prevalence of psychological distress ending up around 11% for men and around 15% for women in 2040. When including the years 2020 and 2022, however, the projections suggested an increase in psychological distress in the general population and the prevalence of psychological distress is projected to end up around 37 % for both men and women in 2030. Conclusions The prevalence of psychological distress has increased substantially in the 2020s particularly in young adults. Mental health needs to be given a priority in all policies in order to change the future projections. Key messages • The upward trend of psychological distress did not reverse or plateau after COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. • Increased efforts to protect and promote mental health in all policies seem indicated especially among young adults.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.2215
Primary Topic
Health, psychology, and well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Past trends and future projections of psychological distress among general population in Finland

Jaakko Reinikainen, Hanna K Tolonen, Jari M. T. Lahti, Suvi Parikka et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Health, psychology, and well-being
article

Past trends and future projections of psychological distress among general population in Finland

Jaakko Reinikainen, Hanna K Tolonen, Jari M. T. Lahti, Suvi Parikka, Annamari Lundqvist, Jaana Suvisaari, Majbrit V. Holm
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The aim was to examine past and future trends of psychological distress in Finland from 2013 to 2040. Methods Six representative cross-sectional surveys from the years 2013, 2014, 2015, 2018, 2020, and 2022 (N = 172,547, aged 20+ y) were used. Multiple imputation was used in projecting psychological distress (MHI-5, with cut-off value ≤60). As the COVID-19 pandemic had a strong effect on psychological distress which persisted after the pandemic, projections were made with and without data from the years 2020 and 2022. Results The prevalence of psychological distress was slightly declining during the period 2013-2018 for both men and women, ending up around 18% for men and 19% for women. When including the years 2020 and 2022, however, trends showed a steep increase in the prevalence of psychological distress during 2018-2022. Among 20-39-year-olds, the prevalence of psychological distress increased 9.8%-points over the four-year period. Similarly, among 40-54-year-olds, an 8.2%-points increase was observed. In older age groups (55-64, 65-74 and 75 years and older) psychological distress first increased from 2018 to 2020 but then plateaued especially among the oldest. Projections based on the observed past trends during the period 2013-2018 showed a steady decline in psychological distress, the prevalence of psychological distress ending up around 11% for men and around 15% for women in 2040. When including the years 2020 and 2022, however, the projections suggested an increase in psychological distress in the general population and the prevalence of psychological distress is projected to end up around 37 % for both men and women in 2030. Conclusions The prevalence of psychological distress has increased substantially in the 2020s particularly in young adults. Mental health needs to be given a priority in all policies in order to change the future projections. Key messages • The upward trend of psychological distress did not reverse or plateau after COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. • Increased efforts to protect and promote mental health in all policies seem indicated especially among young adults.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Health, psychology, and well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.