Virtual patient analysis identifies strategies to improve the performance of predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade

Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) show variable responses to PD-1 inhibition. Efficient patient selection by predictive biomarkers would be desirable but is hindered by the limited performance of existing biomarkers. Here, we leveraged in silico patient cohorts generated using a quantitative systems pharmacology model of metastatic TNBC, informed by transcriptomic and clinical data, to explore potential ways to improve patient selection. We evaluated and quantified the performance of 90 biomarker candidates, including various cellular and molecular species, at different cutoffs by a cutoff-based biomarker testing algorithm combined with machine learning-based feature selection. Combinations of pretreatment biomarkers improved the specificity compared to single biomarkers at the cost of reduced sensitivity. On the other hand, early on-treatment biomarkers, such as the relative change in tumor diameter from baseline measured at two weeks after treatment initiation, achieved remarkably higher sensitivity and specificity. Further, blood-based biomarkers had a comparable ability to tumor- or lymph node-based biomarkers in identifying a subset of responders, potentially suggesting a less invasive way for patient selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2410911121
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual patient analysis identifies strategies to improve the performance of predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade

Leisha A. Emens, Elana J. Fertig, Aleksander S. Popel, Cesar A. Santa‐Maria et al.
10 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
2.83
article

Virtual patient analysis identifies strategies to improve the performance of predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade

Leisha A. Emens, Elana J. Fertig, Aleksander S. Popel, Cesar A. Santa‐Maria, Elizabeth M. Jaffee, Theinmozhi Arulraj, Ravi Varadhan, Atul Deshpande, Hanwen Wang
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) show variable responses to PD-1 inhibition. Efficient patient selection by predictive biomarkers would be desirable but is hindered by the limited performance of existing biomarkers. Here, we leveraged in silico patient cohorts generated using a quantitative systems pharmacology model of metastatic TNBC, informed by transcriptomic and clinical data, to explore potential ways to improve patient selection. We evaluated and quantified the performance of 90 biomarker candidates, including various cellular and molecular species, at different cutoffs by a cutoff-based biomarker testing algorithm combined with machine learning-based feature selection. Combinations of pretreatment biomarkers improved the specificity compared to single biomarkers at the cost of reduced sensitivity. On the other hand, early on-treatment biomarkers, such as the relative change in tumor diameter from baseline measured at two weeks after treatment initiation, achieved remarkably higher sensitivity and specificity. Further, blood-based biomarkers had a comparable ability to tumor- or lymph node-based biomarkers in identifying a subset of responders, potentially suggesting a less invasive way for patient selection.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 121(45)
Bloomberg (United States) (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center (US), Convergence (US), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
National Science Foundation, Johns Hopkins University, National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
2.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.