Social networks and gender inequitable attitudes among men and women in rural Nepal

Gender-inequitable attitudes are known factors associated with women's experience of intimate partner violence (IPV). The current study aims to identify social network factors associated with gender-inequitable attitudes among men and women in Nepal. Data came from the baseline assessment for evaluating Change Starts at Home- an IPV prevention intervention in rural Nepal (<i>N</i> = 1994). Linear regression models adjusted for participant demographics provided the associations between participants' gender-inequitable attitude scores (GIAS) and their social network characteristics. Results show that women who nominated their parents (beta = -1.29) or neighbours (beta = -1.18) had better GIAS while those nominating their brother-in-law/sister-in-law (beta = 0.36) had worse GIAS. Men with higher degree (beta = -0.27) and those who nominated their spouse (beta = -0.75) had better GIAS. Women's GIAS was strongly associated with their alters' when the alter was within their household, had a closer relationship, or the alter was male. Men's GIAS was strongly associated with their alters' attitudes when the alter was not from the same household or if they had a weak tie. Findings indicate that IPV prevention programmes must consider men's and women's network characteristics separately. For example, interventions for women should focus on relationships within their households, while interventions for men should focus on relationships outside their households.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2024.2420706
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social networks and gender inequitable attitudes among men and women in rural Nepal

Cari J. Clark, Holly B. Shakya, Abbie Shervinskie, Shweta Tomar et al.
2 citations
Global Public Health
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
1.06
article

Social networks and gender inequitable attitudes among men and women in rural Nepal

Cari J. Clark, Holly B. Shakya, Abbie Shervinskie, Shweta Tomar, Gemma Ferguson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Gender-inequitable attitudes are known factors associated with women's experience of intimate partner violence (IPV). The current study aims to identify social network factors associated with gender-inequitable attitudes among men and women in Nepal. Data came from the baseline assessment for evaluating Change Starts at Home- an IPV prevention intervention in rural Nepal (<i>N</i> = 1994). Linear regression models adjusted for participant demographics provided the associations between participants' gender-inequitable attitude scores (GIAS) and their social network characteristics. Results show that women who nominated their parents (beta = -1.29) or neighbours (beta = -1.18) had better GIAS while those nominating their brother-in-law/sister-in-law (beta = 0.36) had worse GIAS. Men with higher degree (beta = -0.27) and those who nominated their spouse (beta = -0.75) had better GIAS. Women's GIAS was strongly associated with their alters' when the alter was within their household, had a closer relationship, or the alter was male. Men's GIAS was strongly associated with their alters' attitudes when the alter was not from the same household or if they had a weak tie. Findings indicate that IPV prevention programmes must consider men's and women's network characteristics separately. For example, interventions for women should focus on relationships within their households, while interventions for men should focus on relationships outside their households.

Global Public HealthVol. 19(1)
Emory University (US), University of California San Diego (US), Center for Health and Gender Equity (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.