Social Inequalities in mental health service use and perceived helpfulness: A global analysis across 111 countries

Abstract Social inequalities in mental health are evident in the prevalence of mental health problems, but also the utilisation and patents’ perceived benefits of treatment. However, the extent of these disparities on a global scale and whether there are country-level differences in the predictors of mental health service use remain unknown. This study uses data from the Wellcome Global Monitor 2020, a nationally representative survey encompassing 111 countries and 117,088 individuals. We examine the association of socio-economic factors (such as household income and education), psycho-social factors (including stigma perception and trust in health professionals), and country-level variables (such as GDP, Gini coefficient, and health expenditure) with mental health service use and perceived effectiveness of treatment. Multi-level logistic regression models were employed for analysis. The utilisation of mental health professions of people with depression or anxiety symptomology is higher in HICs (predicted probability of 62% CI[0.60 - 0.65]) compared to LIMCs (predicted probability of 33% CI[0.31 - 0.34]). Higher country GDP (OR = 1.26 CI[1.08-1.47]) and health expenditure (OR = 1.11 CI[1.04-1.19] per percentage of health expenditure) are associated with higher treatment utilisation. On the individual level, those in the wealthiest quintile are more likely to engage with mental health professionals (OR = 1.25[1.14-1.36]) and perceive this treatment as highly beneficial (OR = 1.23[1.07-1.40]). Trust in healthcare practitioners and perceived stigma are also associated with mental healthcare use. This analysis shows strong patterns of mental healthcare use and perceived benefits depending on the wealth of the country, health expenditure and individual socio-economic status. Moreover, disparities in treatment utilization and effectiveness are also influenced by trust in healthcare professionals and perceived mental health stigma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.109
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Inequalities in mental health service use and perceived helpfulness: A global analysis across 111 countries

Christoph Henking
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Mental Health Treatment and Access
0.64
article

Social Inequalities in mental health service use and perceived helpfulness: A global analysis across 111 countries

Christoph Henking
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Social inequalities in mental health are evident in the prevalence of mental health problems, but also the utilisation and patents’ perceived benefits of treatment. However, the extent of these disparities on a global scale and whether there are country-level differences in the predictors of mental health service use remain unknown. This study uses data from the Wellcome Global Monitor 2020, a nationally representative survey encompassing 111 countries and 117,088 individuals. We examine the association of socio-economic factors (such as household income and education), psycho-social factors (including stigma perception and trust in health professionals), and country-level variables (such as GDP, Gini coefficient, and health expenditure) with mental health service use and perceived effectiveness of treatment. Multi-level logistic regression models were employed for analysis. The utilisation of mental health professions of people with depression or anxiety symptomology is higher in HICs (predicted probability of 62% CI[0.60 - 0.65]) compared to LIMCs (predicted probability of 33% CI[0.31 - 0.34]). Higher country GDP (OR = 1.26 CI[1.08-1.47]) and health expenditure (OR = 1.11 CI[1.04-1.19] per percentage of health expenditure) are associated with higher treatment utilisation. On the individual level, those in the wealthiest quintile are more likely to engage with mental health professionals (OR = 1.25[1.14-1.36]) and perceive this treatment as highly beneficial (OR = 1.23[1.07-1.40]). Trust in healthcare practitioners and perceived stigma are also associated with mental healthcare use. This analysis shows strong patterns of mental healthcare use and perceived benefits depending on the wealth of the country, health expenditure and individual socio-economic status. Moreover, disparities in treatment utilization and effectiveness are also influenced by trust in healthcare professionals and perceived mental health stigma.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Oxford Policy Management (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.