Engaging practitioners in developing a guide for citizen participation in community health promotion

Abstract Background Community health promotion aims to improve the living conditions in municipalities, cities, or regions to support health maintenance or promotion. Participation is a fundamental element in health promotion, as it enables community members to engage in decision-making, program development, and tailored health initiatives. This project focused on crafting a practical guide for citizen participation in community health promotion, involving experts and future users. Methods We conducted a literature review to identify existing guidelines and materials pertinent to community health promotion, with a focus on practical guidance for municipal practitioners. To delve deeper into the topic, we conducted interviews with 6 experts in the field of participation and community health promotion as well as with 6 practitioners working in “healthy municipalities” in Lower Austria. The guide was developed collaboratively, with two workshops being held to gather input on the draft concept of the guide and to prioritize topics. Moreover, experts and practitioners were involved to provide feedback on the drafted guidance document. Results Discrepancies emerged between theoretical concepts and real-life implementation of community participation. While the literature delineates up to 12 participation levels, practitioners identified three: contributing ideas, advising and co-deciding, and actively participating in planning and implementation. Informing the target group was conceptualized as a preliminary stage and basic requirement for citizen participation. Above all, practitioners sought low-key suggestions and short descriptions of methods that they could use directly in their everyday context. Conclusions Involving practitioners and potential users enhanced the accessibility and utility of the guide. Their input ensured that the guide remained practical, relevant and informative without excessive academic or theoretical abstraction. Key messages • Involving health promotion practitioners helped shaping the practical guide in a way to be most useful for the intended audience. • Experts and practitioners have different views regarding the theoretical distinctions of levels of participation in community health promotion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1751
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging practitioners in developing a guide for citizen participation in community health promotion

Mariella Seel, Ursula Griebler, Pauline Klingenstein, Christina Kien
European Journal of Public Health
Community Health and Development
article

Engaging practitioners in developing a guide for citizen participation in community health promotion

Mariella Seel, Ursula Griebler, Pauline Klingenstein, Christina Kien
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Community health promotion aims to improve the living conditions in municipalities, cities, or regions to support health maintenance or promotion. Participation is a fundamental element in health promotion, as it enables community members to engage in decision-making, program development, and tailored health initiatives. This project focused on crafting a practical guide for citizen participation in community health promotion, involving experts and future users. Methods We conducted a literature review to identify existing guidelines and materials pertinent to community health promotion, with a focus on practical guidance for municipal practitioners. To delve deeper into the topic, we conducted interviews with 6 experts in the field of participation and community health promotion as well as with 6 practitioners working in “healthy municipalities” in Lower Austria. The guide was developed collaboratively, with two workshops being held to gather input on the draft concept of the guide and to prioritize topics. Moreover, experts and practitioners were involved to provide feedback on the drafted guidance document. Results Discrepancies emerged between theoretical concepts and real-life implementation of community participation. While the literature delineates up to 12 participation levels, practitioners identified three: contributing ideas, advising and co-deciding, and actively participating in planning and implementation. Informing the target group was conceptualized as a preliminary stage and basic requirement for citizen participation. Above all, practitioners sought low-key suggestions and short descriptions of methods that they could use directly in their everyday context. Conclusions Involving practitioners and potential users enhanced the accessibility and utility of the guide. Their input ensured that the guide remained practical, relevant and informative without excessive academic or theoretical abstraction. Key messages • Involving health promotion practitioners helped shaping the practical guide in a way to be most useful for the intended audience. • Experts and practitioners have different views regarding the theoretical distinctions of levels of participation in community health promotion.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
ZonMw
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.