Risk communication with asylum-seekers: Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic experience in Munich

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has created a ‘double crisis’ for asylum-seekers, whose lives were already in crisis. Many reports indicated the syndemic consequences on asylum seekers’ health, underscoring the need for their inclusion in risk communication (RC) and community engagement (CE) and infodemic management (IM) actions. This study aims to describe RCCE experience with asylum seekers in Munich during the COVID-19 pandemic from an expert perspective and thus gain a thorough understanding of the requirements for inclusive RCCE. Methods Our qualitative study involved people who conducted COVID-19-related RCCE for asylum-seekers. Volunteers/workers of civil society organizations and health professionals were interviewed using purposeful sampling. After reviewing international guidelines, an interview form was created. The content analysis resulted in themes and categories. Results Four of the interviewees were health managers, while 8 were working in civil society organizations. The first category of the results describes the context in which RCCE occurs; syndemic factors (uncertainty; social exclusion and stigma; precarious housing; limited access to healthcare and unmet mental health needs) and pandemic management. The second category includes determinants of RCCE from both the asylum-seeker (trust; risk perception; health literacy; language; culture and gender) and RCCE member (competences; overburden; continuity) standpoint. The third category focuses on various RCCE-IM measures, including their effectiveness and consequences. Conclusions Syndemic factors hampered the effective implementation of RCCE for asylum seekers in Munich. RCCE determinants show that pre-crisis actions are necessary for an effective response and individual interactions should accompany community-level activities, particularly for female and marginalised migrants. This study’s scope will be expanded by incorporating the IM component.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.792
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk communication with asylum-seekers: Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic experience in Munich

F. Link, Z Öcek
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Migration, Health and Trauma
0.64
article

Risk communication with asylum-seekers: Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic experience in Munich

F. Link, Z Öcek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has created a ‘double crisis’ for asylum-seekers, whose lives were already in crisis. Many reports indicated the syndemic consequences on asylum seekers’ health, underscoring the need for their inclusion in risk communication (RC) and community engagement (CE) and infodemic management (IM) actions. This study aims to describe RCCE experience with asylum seekers in Munich during the COVID-19 pandemic from an expert perspective and thus gain a thorough understanding of the requirements for inclusive RCCE. Methods Our qualitative study involved people who conducted COVID-19-related RCCE for asylum-seekers. Volunteers/workers of civil society organizations and health professionals were interviewed using purposeful sampling. After reviewing international guidelines, an interview form was created. The content analysis resulted in themes and categories. Results Four of the interviewees were health managers, while 8 were working in civil society organizations. The first category of the results describes the context in which RCCE occurs; syndemic factors (uncertainty; social exclusion and stigma; precarious housing; limited access to healthcare and unmet mental health needs) and pandemic management. The second category includes determinants of RCCE from both the asylum-seeker (trust; risk perception; health literacy; language; culture and gender) and RCCE member (competences; overburden; continuity) standpoint. The third category focuses on various RCCE-IM measures, including their effectiveness and consequences. Conclusions Syndemic factors hampered the effective implementation of RCCE for asylum seekers in Munich. RCCE determinants show that pre-crisis actions are necessary for an effective response and individual interactions should accompany community-level activities, particularly for female and marginalised migrants. This study’s scope will be expanded by incorporating the IM component.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Health Information Management (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Migration, Health and Trauma
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.