Parent perspectives on sports betting and its effects on children

Abstract Background Gambling-related harm is a global challenge. Sports betting is a rapidly growing form of gambling, facilitated by access to online wagering platforms and increased advertising. Most public health initiatives target ‘problem’ gamblers, ignoring socio-cultural influences. Within this context, we examine what parents think about sports betting, the potential impacts on their children, and whether they participate in sports betting around their children. Methods Using a survey of 3,481 Australian adult sports fans with dependent children, we analyse parental attitudes to sports betting and their concerns about possible effects on children. ANOVA and regression methods are used to test for differences in attitudes to sports betting between parents who are gamblers (sports and non-sports) and non-gamblers. Results Compared to non-gambling parents, sports-betting parents are much more permissive (by up to 0.9 standard deviations) of sports betting around and by children, and less concerned (by up to 0.6 standard deviations) about any harmful effects of sports betting on children. Sports betting parents place less importance on discussing the risks of sports betting with their children, and the more often a parent bets on sports, the less confident they are about having these discussions. Parents who bet on sports are 5.8 percentage points less likely than non-gambling parents to have had such conversations. Conclusions The strong influence of parent modelling and normalisation, combined with policy initiatives that recommend parents discuss potential sports betting risks with their children, implies that having a better understanding of attitudes will facilitate improved educational and harm minimisation policy initiatives. The findings of our study are important for public health policy and should inform interventions aimed at gambling harm reduction. Targeting sports betting parents with better tailored educational campaigns is warranted. Key messages • Children of parents who bet on sports are less likely to receive messages about the risks of sports betting, in addition to being exposed to role modelling that reinforces sports betting. • Compared to non-gambling parents, those who bet on sports have more permissive attitudes towards sports betting, suggesting targeted messaging and interventions are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1739
Primary Topic
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parent perspectives on sports betting and its effects on children

Erica Randle, Alex Donaldson, Matthew Nicholson, Buly A. Cardak et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
article

Parent perspectives on sports betting and its effects on children

Erica Randle, Alex Donaldson, Matthew Nicholson, Buly A. Cardak, Emma Seal, Kevin J. Staley, Paul O’Halloran
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Gambling-related harm is a global challenge. Sports betting is a rapidly growing form of gambling, facilitated by access to online wagering platforms and increased advertising. Most public health initiatives target ‘problem’ gamblers, ignoring socio-cultural influences. Within this context, we examine what parents think about sports betting, the potential impacts on their children, and whether they participate in sports betting around their children. Methods Using a survey of 3,481 Australian adult sports fans with dependent children, we analyse parental attitudes to sports betting and their concerns about possible effects on children. ANOVA and regression methods are used to test for differences in attitudes to sports betting between parents who are gamblers (sports and non-sports) and non-gamblers. Results Compared to non-gambling parents, sports-betting parents are much more permissive (by up to 0.9 standard deviations) of sports betting around and by children, and less concerned (by up to 0.6 standard deviations) about any harmful effects of sports betting on children. Sports betting parents place less importance on discussing the risks of sports betting with their children, and the more often a parent bets on sports, the less confident they are about having these discussions. Parents who bet on sports are 5.8 percentage points less likely than non-gambling parents to have had such conversations. Conclusions The strong influence of parent modelling and normalisation, combined with policy initiatives that recommend parents discuss potential sports betting risks with their children, implies that having a better understanding of attitudes will facilitate improved educational and harm minimisation policy initiatives. The findings of our study are important for public health policy and should inform interventions aimed at gambling harm reduction. Targeting sports betting parents with better tailored educational campaigns is warranted. Key messages • Children of parents who bet on sports are less likely to receive messages about the risks of sports betting, in addition to being exposed to role modelling that reinforces sports betting. • Compared to non-gambling parents, those who bet on sports have more permissive attitudes towards sports betting, suggesting targeted messaging and interventions are warranted.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
La Trobe University (AU), MIT University (MK), Impact (CA), Monash University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.