Revisiting the Science-Policy Interface: Lessons from the Swiss Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract Background In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, Switzerland found itself grappling with unforeseen challenges, particularly in the realm of the science-policy interface. Despite various post-crisis reflections on ‘lessons learned’, a cohesive and comprehensive assessment of these pivotal interactions has been notably absent. We aim to contribute to closing this gap by mapping interactions at the science-policy interface and critically analyze the interaction between researchers and policymakers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Methods Using Critical Discourse Analysis, we examine the sociopolitical influences on the discourse surrounding science-policy interaction. Our dataset includes tweets from Swiss National COVID-19 Science Task Force members, Federal Office of Public Health members, and government representatives, as well as print media articles and official press releases from public health departments. Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power-knowledge dynamics, we explore how researchers and decision-makers interact in the public sphere. Results Key aspects identified: (1) power struggles surrounding accountability and role clarity among stakeholders, (2) the dual role of print and social media as both vehicle for dissemination and communicator shaping public perception, and (3) the pervasive ambiguity in science-policy collaboration throughout the Swiss COVID-19 response. Conclusions Our study emphasizes the importance of reflective learning, drawing on insights from the COVID-19 pandemic. It reveals the complexities in navigating public health crises, emphasizing the challenges of transparency, accuracy, and delineation of responsibilities. These dynamics stress the need for continuous evaluation and refinement of strategies to foster collaboration between researchers and policymakers for effective pandemic preparedness and response. Key messages • Understanding and Addressing Power Dynamics in Science-Policy Interactions. • Necessity for continuous evaluation to enhance collaboration between researchers and policymakers for future preparedness and response efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.2174
Primary Topic
International Science and Diplomacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Science-Policy Interface: Lessons from the Swiss Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Silke Meyer, Annika Frahsa
European Journal of Public Health
International Science and Diplomacy
article

Revisiting the Science-Policy Interface: Lessons from the Swiss Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Silke Meyer, Annika Frahsa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, Switzerland found itself grappling with unforeseen challenges, particularly in the realm of the science-policy interface. Despite various post-crisis reflections on ‘lessons learned’, a cohesive and comprehensive assessment of these pivotal interactions has been notably absent. We aim to contribute to closing this gap by mapping interactions at the science-policy interface and critically analyze the interaction between researchers and policymakers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Methods Using Critical Discourse Analysis, we examine the sociopolitical influences on the discourse surrounding science-policy interaction. Our dataset includes tweets from Swiss National COVID-19 Science Task Force members, Federal Office of Public Health members, and government representatives, as well as print media articles and official press releases from public health departments. Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power-knowledge dynamics, we explore how researchers and decision-makers interact in the public sphere. Results Key aspects identified: (1) power struggles surrounding accountability and role clarity among stakeholders, (2) the dual role of print and social media as both vehicle for dissemination and communicator shaping public perception, and (3) the pervasive ambiguity in science-policy collaboration throughout the Swiss COVID-19 response. Conclusions Our study emphasizes the importance of reflective learning, drawing on insights from the COVID-19 pandemic. It reveals the complexities in navigating public health crises, emphasizing the challenges of transparency, accuracy, and delineation of responsibilities. These dynamics stress the need for continuous evaluation and refinement of strategies to foster collaboration between researchers and policymakers for effective pandemic preparedness and response. Key messages • Understanding and Addressing Power Dynamics in Science-Policy Interactions. • Necessity for continuous evaluation to enhance collaboration between researchers and policymakers for future preparedness and response efforts.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
University of Bern (CH), Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
International Science and Diplomacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.