Addressing vulnerable groups in (public) health and humanitarian crises using RCCE-IM strategies

Abstract Background Vulnerable groups, including older people, infants and children, women, people with disabilities, migrant populations, individuals with marginalized sexual and gender identities, etc., become more fragile in public health and humanitarian crises. These groups’ vulnerability limits their access to health care and other services. Labeling, stigmatization, stereotyping, and other negative consequences contribute to the burden. Concurrent with the motto of the World Health Organization, “Leaving no one behind,’ it reminds us of the need for equality and equity-based models to reach these vulnerable groups in such crises. Methods Existing scientific literature and perspectives were synthesized. Results Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) contains various experiences. Since the pandemic, the need for interdisciplinary approaches and strategies has become more apparent based on the complexity and intersectionality of the determinants of the crisis. In this regard, Risk Communication (RC), Community Engagement (CE) and Infodemic Management (IM) strategies before, during, and after crises might be used to respond to and mitigate the hazards. Preparation plans before the crisis are almost the most effective intervention. However, “during” and “after” crises need considerable steps of RCCE-IM as well. Listening to the concerns of the vulnerable populations, avoiding discriminatory language, providing correct and timely information, using effective communication strategies, using tools to build resilience, and engaging with the community should be built and/or strengthened among the vulnerable groups. Conclusions Addressing structural vulnerabilities with public and global health perspective might provide us with more sustainable and efficient solutions. In this presentation, answers will be provided on how to use RCCE-IM strategies in structural vulnerability and the strengths and weaknesses of the system with the proposed solutions based on the global situation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.790
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing vulnerable groups in (public) health and humanitarian crises using RCCE-IM strategies

Deniz Aslan
3 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Health and Conflict Studies
2.55
article

Addressing vulnerable groups in (public) health and humanitarian crises using RCCE-IM strategies

Deniz Aslan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Vulnerable groups, including older people, infants and children, women, people with disabilities, migrant populations, individuals with marginalized sexual and gender identities, etc., become more fragile in public health and humanitarian crises. These groups’ vulnerability limits their access to health care and other services. Labeling, stigmatization, stereotyping, and other negative consequences contribute to the burden. Concurrent with the motto of the World Health Organization, “Leaving no one behind,’ it reminds us of the need for equality and equity-based models to reach these vulnerable groups in such crises. Methods Existing scientific literature and perspectives were synthesized. Results Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) contains various experiences. Since the pandemic, the need for interdisciplinary approaches and strategies has become more apparent based on the complexity and intersectionality of the determinants of the crisis. In this regard, Risk Communication (RC), Community Engagement (CE) and Infodemic Management (IM) strategies before, during, and after crises might be used to respond to and mitigate the hazards. Preparation plans before the crisis are almost the most effective intervention. However, “during” and “after” crises need considerable steps of RCCE-IM as well. Listening to the concerns of the vulnerable populations, avoiding discriminatory language, providing correct and timely information, using effective communication strategies, using tools to build resilience, and engaging with the community should be built and/or strengthened among the vulnerable groups. Conclusions Addressing structural vulnerabilities with public and global health perspective might provide us with more sustainable and efficient solutions. In this presentation, answers will be provided on how to use RCCE-IM strategies in structural vulnerability and the strengths and weaknesses of the system with the proposed solutions based on the global situation.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Hacettepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health and Conflict Studies
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.