Negotiations with Multidimensional Uncertainty and the Efficiency of Integrated Deals

We study negotiations over multiple goods or dimensions when the maximum potential surplus that can be reached is known but the bundle of goods or decisions that realizes that surplus involves two-sided incomplete information. We use theory and controlled laboratory experiments to show that in such settings efficient trade is possible despite substantial asymmetric information. Moreover, we show that achieving efficient outcomes depends on having sufficiently rich negotiation protocols. By contrast, if agents negotiate over every good separately, then all equilibria are inefficient. We extend the theory and experiments to instances in which the surplus is either approximately known or unknown.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733777
Primary Topic
Auction Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiations with Multidimensional Uncertainty and the Efficiency of Integrated Deals

Christis G. Tombazos, Matthew O. Jackson, Omar Al‐Ubaydli, Yiqing Xing et al.
Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics
Auction Theory and Applications
article

Negotiations with Multidimensional Uncertainty and the Efficiency of Integrated Deals

Christis G. Tombazos, Matthew O. Jackson, Omar Al‐Ubaydli, Yiqing Xing, Hugo F. Sonnenschein
article en

Abstract

We study negotiations over multiple goods or dimensions when the maximum potential surplus that can be reached is known but the bundle of goods or decisions that realizes that surplus involves two-sided incomplete information. We use theory and controlled laboratory experiments to show that in such settings efficient trade is possible despite substantial asymmetric information. Moreover, we show that achieving efficient outcomes depends on having sufficiently rich negotiation protocols. By contrast, if agents negotiate over every good separately, then all equilibria are inefficient. We extend the theory and experiments to instances in which the surplus is either approximately known or unknown.

Journal of Political Economy MicroeconomicsVol. 3(4)
Santa Fe Institute (US), Peking University (CN), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), University of Chicago (US), Bahrain Center for Strategic International and Energy Studies (BH), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Auction Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Negotiations with Multidimensional Uncertainty and the Efficiency of Integrated Deals — Christis G. Tombazos, Matthew O. Jackson, et al. · Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS