Sickness absence patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic among Finnish public sector employees

Abstract Background The patterns of sickness absence (SA), that is, the clustering of differing lengths of episodes and total number of days absent, have not been examined. We examined these SA patterns and factors associated with the patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We used survey data from employees of four large Finnish cities in 2020 linked with SA data in 2021 retrieved from employer registers (n = 39 791). SA patterns were defined through cluster analysis (K-means) including number of SA days, short (1-9 days), and long (10-365 days) SA episodes within one year. The associations of employee and work characteristics in 2020 with SA clusters in 2021 were analysed with multinomial regression. Results Four SA patterns (=clusters) were identified: 1) Optimal SA pattern (n = 31 320, 79%), 2) Recurring short SA episodes (n = 5149, 13%), 3) Recurring long SA episodes (n = 2964, 7%), and 4) Very high levels of SA with long episodes (n = 358, 1%). Compared to optimal SA pattern, female gender, higher body mass index, former smoking, abstinence from alcohol, not being in high occupational socioeconomic position, on-site work during COVID-19, and COVID-19 infection were associated with all suboptimal SA patterns. Recurring short SA episodes were more likely in younger employees (odds ratio=0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.97-0.98), those with a temporary job (1.10, 1.00-1.20), current smokers (1.34, 1.21-1.48), those using passive commute modes (1.03, 1.01-1.05 [car]; 1.02, 1.00-1.04 [public transport]), and those who had experienced a team reorganization due to COVID-19 (1.27, 1.10-1.46). The two most adverse SA patterns were more likely among older employees, and less likely among those cycling to work (0.91, 0.84-0.98; 0.97, 0.95-0.99). Conclusions We identified three differential suboptimal SA patterns. Compared to the optimal SA pattern, several individual-level risk factors, but also some COVID-19 related factors were found to associate with suboptimal SA patterns. Key messages • We identified three suboptimal sickness absence patterns during COVID-19 pandemic. • Individual characteristics, but also COVID-19 related factors were associated with the observed sickness absence patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.917
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sickness absence patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic among Finnish public sector employees

Eija Haukka, Johanna Kausto, Mika Kivimaki B, Jenni Ervasti et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Sickness absence patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic among Finnish public sector employees

Eija Haukka, Johanna Kausto, Mika Kivimaki B, Jenni Ervasti, Matti Joensuu, Jussi Vahtera, Tuula Oksanen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The patterns of sickness absence (SA), that is, the clustering of differing lengths of episodes and total number of days absent, have not been examined. We examined these SA patterns and factors associated with the patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We used survey data from employees of four large Finnish cities in 2020 linked with SA data in 2021 retrieved from employer registers (n = 39 791). SA patterns were defined through cluster analysis (K-means) including number of SA days, short (1-9 days), and long (10-365 days) SA episodes within one year. The associations of employee and work characteristics in 2020 with SA clusters in 2021 were analysed with multinomial regression. Results Four SA patterns (=clusters) were identified: 1) Optimal SA pattern (n = 31 320, 79%), 2) Recurring short SA episodes (n = 5149, 13%), 3) Recurring long SA episodes (n = 2964, 7%), and 4) Very high levels of SA with long episodes (n = 358, 1%). Compared to optimal SA pattern, female gender, higher body mass index, former smoking, abstinence from alcohol, not being in high occupational socioeconomic position, on-site work during COVID-19, and COVID-19 infection were associated with all suboptimal SA patterns. Recurring short SA episodes were more likely in younger employees (odds ratio=0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.97-0.98), those with a temporary job (1.10, 1.00-1.20), current smokers (1.34, 1.21-1.48), those using passive commute modes (1.03, 1.01-1.05 [car]; 1.02, 1.00-1.04 [public transport]), and those who had experienced a team reorganization due to COVID-19 (1.27, 1.10-1.46). The two most adverse SA patterns were more likely among older employees, and less likely among those cycling to work (0.91, 0.84-0.98; 0.97, 0.95-0.99). Conclusions We identified three differential suboptimal SA patterns. Compared to the optimal SA pattern, several individual-level risk factors, but also some COVID-19 related factors were found to associate with suboptimal SA patterns. Key messages • We identified three suboptimal sickness absence patterns during COVID-19 pandemic. • Individual characteristics, but also COVID-19 related factors were associated with the observed sickness absence patterns.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Turku (FI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.