Having paid work 1 year after disability claim in different types of mental and behavioural disorders

Abstract Background The majority of claimants diagnosed with a mental and/or behavioral disorder have residual work capacity, however, the chance of actual (return to) work after a disability claim assessment may differ within this diagnosis group depending on the specific type of disease. The aim of this study is to examine the associations of different mental and behavioural diseases with having paid employment one year after the claim assessment. Methods This longitudinal register based cohort study included all work disability applicants with mental and behavioural disorders assessed with residual work capacity in the Netherlands in 2016. Data were derived from the Dutch Social Security Institute (UWV) and were linked to register data on paid employment. ICD codes were used to categorize 11 disease groups (mental retardation, autism spectrum disorders, ADHD, somatoform disorders, adjustment disorders, PTSS, anxiety, personality disorders, mood affective disorders, addictions and delusional disorders. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted separately for applicants who work and not work at time of the claim assessment. Results A total of 8544 claimants (mean age 45, 56% female; n = 1915 work at baseline) were included. In the working group being diagnosed with ADHD (OR 3.05, CI 1.08-8.61) or PTSS (OR 1.45, CI 1.04-2.02) was associated with paid work, and adjustment disorder was negatively associated (OR 0.74, CI 0.56-0.97). In the not-working group, autism spectrum disorder (OR 1.51, CI 1.02-2.22), personality disorder (OR 1.36, CI 1.02-1.81) and addiction (OR 1.94, CI 1.32-2.86) was associated with return to work, and somatoform (OR 0.51, CI 0.31-0.84) disorders and mood affective disorders (OR 0.83, CI 0.70-0.99) were negatively associated. Conclusions The findings of this study show different associations between type of mental and behavioural disease groups and paid employment one year after the claim assessment. Key messages • The association of either remaining at work or return to work is different among mental and behavioural diagnosis groups, therefore a different approach is indicated. • Active interventions to facilitate return to or remain at work might be indicated in specific diagnosis groups.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.571
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Having paid work 1 year after disability claim in different types of mental and behavioural disorders

Tialda Hoekstra, Sandra Brouwer, HJM Boersema, MLW Ziech
European Journal of Public Health
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Having paid work 1 year after disability claim in different types of mental and behavioural disorders

Tialda Hoekstra, Sandra Brouwer, HJM Boersema, MLW Ziech
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The majority of claimants diagnosed with a mental and/or behavioral disorder have residual work capacity, however, the chance of actual (return to) work after a disability claim assessment may differ within this diagnosis group depending on the specific type of disease. The aim of this study is to examine the associations of different mental and behavioural diseases with having paid employment one year after the claim assessment. Methods This longitudinal register based cohort study included all work disability applicants with mental and behavioural disorders assessed with residual work capacity in the Netherlands in 2016. Data were derived from the Dutch Social Security Institute (UWV) and were linked to register data on paid employment. ICD codes were used to categorize 11 disease groups (mental retardation, autism spectrum disorders, ADHD, somatoform disorders, adjustment disorders, PTSS, anxiety, personality disorders, mood affective disorders, addictions and delusional disorders. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted separately for applicants who work and not work at time of the claim assessment. Results A total of 8544 claimants (mean age 45, 56% female; n = 1915 work at baseline) were included. In the working group being diagnosed with ADHD (OR 3.05, CI 1.08-8.61) or PTSS (OR 1.45, CI 1.04-2.02) was associated with paid work, and adjustment disorder was negatively associated (OR 0.74, CI 0.56-0.97). In the not-working group, autism spectrum disorder (OR 1.51, CI 1.02-2.22), personality disorder (OR 1.36, CI 1.02-1.81) and addiction (OR 1.94, CI 1.32-2.86) was associated with return to work, and somatoform (OR 0.51, CI 0.31-0.84) disorders and mood affective disorders (OR 0.83, CI 0.70-0.99) were negatively associated. Conclusions The findings of this study show different associations between type of mental and behavioural disease groups and paid employment one year after the claim assessment. Key messages • The association of either remaining at work or return to work is different among mental and behavioural diagnosis groups, therefore a different approach is indicated. • Active interventions to facilitate return to or remain at work might be indicated in specific diagnosis groups.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.