CLAP

Obtaining well-calibrated photometric redshift probability densities for galaxies without a spectroscopic measurement remains a challenge. Deep learning discriminative models, typically fed with multi-band galaxy images, can produce outputs that mimic probability densities and achieve state-of-the-art accuracy. However, several previous studies have found that such models may be affected by miscalibration, an issue that would result in discrepancies between the model outputs and the actual distributions of true redshifts. Our work develops a novel method called the Contrastive Learning and Adaptive KNN for Photometric Redshift (CLAP) that resolves this issue. It leverages supervised contrastive learning (SCL) and k -nearest neighbours (KNN) to construct and calibrate raw probability density estimates, and implements a refitting procedure to resume end-to-end discriminative models ready to produce final estimates for large-scale imaging data, bypassing the intensive computation required for KNN. The harmonic mean is adopted to combine an ensemble of estimates from multiple realisations for improving accuracy. Our experiments demonstrate that CLAP takes advantage of both deep learning and KNN, outperforming benchmark methods on the calibration of probability density estimates and retaining high accuracy and computational efficiency. With reference to CLAP, a deeper investigation on miscalibration for conventional deep learning is presented. We point out that miscalibration is particularly sensitive to the method-induced excessive correlations among data instances in addition to the unaccounted-for epistemic uncertainties. Reducing the uncertainties may not guarantee the removal of miscalibration due to the presence of such excessive correlations, yet this is a problem for conventional methods rather than CLAP. These discussions underscore the robustness of CLAP for obtaining photometric redshift probability densities required by astrophysical and cosmological applications. This is the first paper in our series on CLAP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202349113
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLAP

N. R. Napolitano, Qiufan Lin, Wei Zhang, D. Fouchez et al.
4 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
2.03
article

CLAP

N. R. Napolitano, Qiufan Lin, Wei Zhang, D. Fouchez, Shupei Chen, Yuan-Sen Ting, Paulo Montero-Camacho, Hengzhi Ruan, Rui Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Obtaining well-calibrated photometric redshift probability densities for galaxies without a spectroscopic measurement remains a challenge. Deep learning discriminative models, typically fed with multi-band galaxy images, can produce outputs that mimic probability densities and achieve state-of-the-art accuracy. However, several previous studies have found that such models may be affected by miscalibration, an issue that would result in discrepancies between the model outputs and the actual distributions of true redshifts. Our work develops a novel method called the Contrastive Learning and Adaptive KNN for Photometric Redshift (CLAP) that resolves this issue. It leverages supervised contrastive learning (SCL) and k -nearest neighbours (KNN) to construct and calibrate raw probability density estimates, and implements a refitting procedure to resume end-to-end discriminative models ready to produce final estimates for large-scale imaging data, bypassing the intensive computation required for KNN. The harmonic mean is adopted to combine an ensemble of estimates from multiple realisations for improving accuracy. Our experiments demonstrate that CLAP takes advantage of both deep learning and KNN, outperforming benchmark methods on the calibration of probability density estimates and retaining high accuracy and computational efficiency. With reference to CLAP, a deeper investigation on miscalibration for conventional deep learning is presented. We point out that miscalibration is particularly sensitive to the method-induced excessive correlations among data instances in addition to the unaccounted-for epistemic uncertainties. Reducing the uncertainties may not guarantee the removal of miscalibration due to the presence of such excessive correlations, yet this is a problem for conventional methods rather than CLAP. These discussions underscore the robustness of CLAP for obtaining photometric redshift probability densities required by astrophysical and cosmological applications. This is the first paper in our series on CLAP.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 691
Australian National University (AU), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Zhengzhou University (CN), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (CN), Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental Quality (CN), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN), The Ohio State University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Yale University, Vanderbilt University, Princeton University, Ohio State University, Harvard University, University of Washington, Johns Hopkins University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Portsmouth, New Mexico State University, Peng Cheng Laboratory, York University, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Università degli Studi di Padova, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Office of Science, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, Institut national des sciences de l'Univers, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
2.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.