In development intervention, professionals aim to enhance working practices and interaction

Abstract Background The social services and healthcare professions are experiencing a global labor shortage. Enhancing the appeal and retention requires the development of work and processes through community-level interventions that reduce workload and bolster resources. Further research into such interventions is necessary. This study focuses on a systematic community-based practice development model (Breakthrough Collaboratives) to evaluate the change in alignment with the development intervention’s objectives and the prerequisites for change. The evaluation will utilize the process evaluation model for well-being at work projects and health promotion interventions. Methods This qualitative process evaluation employs a multi-case study approach to depict the changes occurring during the development intervention. It assesses the development processes of fifteen workplaces across Finland. The research material includes recorded group discussions from the initial workshop, where professionals establish goals and development targets for their work. The qualitative data are analyzed using content analysis. The analysis is guided by questions such as: What goals and development objectives do participants set for their work? What workplace-specific characteristics inform these objectives? Results Preliminary findings indicate that the work units’ development objectives concentrate on updating the unit’s common rules, enhancing the induction process for new employees, improving work behavior, and refining meeting practices. Workplace-specific characteristics differ based on the work unit’s sector, the level of trust among professionals, and their willingness to critically evaluate management. Additionally, competence and professionalism emerge as prominent themes in group discussions. Conclusions In a workplace development intervention, professionals aim to enhance common working practices and interaction, with the goal of improving well-being at work. Key messages • Enhancing operational practices and promoting positive interpersonal conduct among colleagues constitutes a pivotal goal in advancing social and health care work units. • The Community based intervention provides workplaces with concrete models to support co-creation and permanent changes in working practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1888
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In development intervention, professionals aim to enhance working practices and interaction

T Koivisto
European Journal of Public Health
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

In development intervention, professionals aim to enhance working practices and interaction

T Koivisto
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The social services and healthcare professions are experiencing a global labor shortage. Enhancing the appeal and retention requires the development of work and processes through community-level interventions that reduce workload and bolster resources. Further research into such interventions is necessary. This study focuses on a systematic community-based practice development model (Breakthrough Collaboratives) to evaluate the change in alignment with the development intervention’s objectives and the prerequisites for change. The evaluation will utilize the process evaluation model for well-being at work projects and health promotion interventions. Methods This qualitative process evaluation employs a multi-case study approach to depict the changes occurring during the development intervention. It assesses the development processes of fifteen workplaces across Finland. The research material includes recorded group discussions from the initial workshop, where professionals establish goals and development targets for their work. The qualitative data are analyzed using content analysis. The analysis is guided by questions such as: What goals and development objectives do participants set for their work? What workplace-specific characteristics inform these objectives? Results Preliminary findings indicate that the work units’ development objectives concentrate on updating the unit’s common rules, enhancing the induction process for new employees, improving work behavior, and refining meeting practices. Workplace-specific characteristics differ based on the work unit’s sector, the level of trust among professionals, and their willingness to critically evaluate management. Additionally, competence and professionalism emerge as prominent themes in group discussions. Conclusions In a workplace development intervention, professionals aim to enhance common working practices and interaction, with the goal of improving well-being at work. Key messages • Enhancing operational practices and promoting positive interpersonal conduct among colleagues constitutes a pivotal goal in advancing social and health care work units. • The Community based intervention provides workplaces with concrete models to support co-creation and permanent changes in working practices.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.