Development of the health literacy responsiveness (HLR) evaluation framework for HLR interventions

Abstract Background Health literacy responsiveness (HLR) interventions include actions at different levels of an organization to provoke change and improve environments ensuring equitable access to and use of information and services (1). However, generic instruments measuring the effect of HLR at intervention level are inconsistent, making evidence on HLR intervention effects difficult to compare (2). The objective of this study was to develop an evaluation framework based on core outcome domains of HLR to facilitate higher consistency in future evaluations of HLR interventions. Methods HLR outcomes were identified through a narrative literature review and categorized into domains through a content mapping process. Expert consensus on core outcome domains was reached through a Delphi process. Experts within the field of HLR were invited to participate and answer three questionnaires designed to rank and clarify potential core outcome domains. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed to select and complete the final core outcome domains in the HLR evaluation framework (HLR-EF). Results The literature search resulted in identification of nine reviews. A total of 383 outcomes were identified from these reviews and included in the content mapping process, which resulted in a total of 26 core outcome domains. Experts (n = 15) participated in the three-round Delphi process, which resulted in consensus on 15 core outcome domains in HLR-EF allocated under five headings. Conclusions The study has successfully managed to identify a set of core outcome domains applicable in future evaluations of HLR interventions based on systematic methodologies and expert consensus. Context-sensitive manuals for the use of the HLR-EF is under development and the instrument is ready to be applied in future evaluation of HLR interventions, potentially making future measuring, reporting and comparison of results significantly easier. Key messages • Instruments facilitating evaluation of HLR interventions are non-generic and inconsistent. • HLR-EF has been developed using a narrative literature review, content mapping, and a Delphi process, and defines 15 core outcome domains for evaluation of HLR interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1673
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the health literacy responsiveness (HLR) evaluation framework for HLR interventions

Anna Aaby, Liv Stubbe Østergaard, Iben Rask Heuck, Maiken Meldgaard
European Journal of Public Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Development of the health literacy responsiveness (HLR) evaluation framework for HLR interventions

Anna Aaby, Liv Stubbe Østergaard, Iben Rask Heuck, Maiken Meldgaard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Health literacy responsiveness (HLR) interventions include actions at different levels of an organization to provoke change and improve environments ensuring equitable access to and use of information and services (1). However, generic instruments measuring the effect of HLR at intervention level are inconsistent, making evidence on HLR intervention effects difficult to compare (2). The objective of this study was to develop an evaluation framework based on core outcome domains of HLR to facilitate higher consistency in future evaluations of HLR interventions. Methods HLR outcomes were identified through a narrative literature review and categorized into domains through a content mapping process. Expert consensus on core outcome domains was reached through a Delphi process. Experts within the field of HLR were invited to participate and answer three questionnaires designed to rank and clarify potential core outcome domains. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed to select and complete the final core outcome domains in the HLR evaluation framework (HLR-EF). Results The literature search resulted in identification of nine reviews. A total of 383 outcomes were identified from these reviews and included in the content mapping process, which resulted in a total of 26 core outcome domains. Experts (n = 15) participated in the three-round Delphi process, which resulted in consensus on 15 core outcome domains in HLR-EF allocated under five headings. Conclusions The study has successfully managed to identify a set of core outcome domains applicable in future evaluations of HLR interventions based on systematic methodologies and expert consensus. Context-sensitive manuals for the use of the HLR-EF is under development and the instrument is ready to be applied in future evaluation of HLR interventions, potentially making future measuring, reporting and comparison of results significantly easier. Key messages • Instruments facilitating evaluation of HLR interventions are non-generic and inconsistent. • HLR-EF has been developed using a narrative literature review, content mapping, and a Delphi process, and defines 15 core outcome domains for evaluation of HLR interventions.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Steno Diabetes Centers (DK), Deakin University (AU), Aarhus University (DK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.