A Woman’s Right to Know: State Abortion Law and the Due Process Fair Notice Requirement

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, the loss of reproductive freedom was not the only health care crisis created by the Court. Across the country, people with chronic conditions, including autoimmune disease, were unable to access their prescription medication after abortion bans imposed restrictions on abortion-inducing drugs. Texas’s state medication abortion law, the Woman’s Right to Know Act, may prevent those with disabilities from accessing lifesaving medication with abortifacient properties. This unintended consequence puts health care professionals such as doctors and pharmacists at risk of legal liability for simply prescribing the best course of treatment. This Note argues that the Woman’s Right to Know Act has left health care professionals unable to understand what conduct is prohibited and provides too much discretion to law enforcement, rendering the law unconstitutionally vague. Clarifying the law and prohibiting provider liability is in the best interests of both patients and providers and will allow health care professionals to continue their work to protect patient health.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Boston College Law Review
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70167/rqie9853
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Woman’s Right to Know: State Abortion Law and the Due Process Fair Notice Requirement

Maria Russo
Boston College Law Review
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
article

A Woman’s Right to Know: State Abortion Law and the Due Process Fair Notice Requirement

Maria Russo
article en

Abstract

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, the loss of reproductive freedom was not the only health care crisis created by the Court. Across the country, people with chronic conditions, including autoimmune disease, were unable to access their prescription medication after abortion bans imposed restrictions on abortion-inducing drugs. Texas’s state medication abortion law, the Woman’s Right to Know Act, may prevent those with disabilities from accessing lifesaving medication with abortifacient properties. This unintended consequence puts health care professionals such as doctors and pharmacists at risk of legal liability for simply prescribing the best course of treatment. This Note argues that the Woman’s Right to Know Act has left health care professionals unable to understand what conduct is prohibited and provides too much discretion to law enforcement, rendering the law unconstitutionally vague. Clarifying the law and prohibiting provider liability is in the best interests of both patients and providers and will allow health care professionals to continue their work to protect patient health.

Boston College Law ReviewVol. 65(7)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Woman’s Right to Know: State Abortion Law and the Due Process Fair Notice Requirement — Maria Russo · Boston College Law Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS