Assessing contextual factors influencing scale-up: a interactive approach involving stakeholders

Abstract Issue Pilot interventions are not always put into practice at scale. When they are, effectiveness is often highly reduced in the field due to contextual factors. To effectively implement a scale-up, stakeholders’ involvement is crucial. Curema is an international research evaluating an intervention aiming to reduce malaria transmission by distributing RDTs and treatments in mobile hard-to-reach populations. This intervention might be scaled-up in Brazil, Suriname, and French Guiana as a tool of national malaria programs for specific areas and populations. Description of the problem An interactive pre-planning assessment was conducted involving key stakeholders -implementers, decision-makers, and researchers - in working sessions, semi-structured interviews, and formal meetings. Mendelow’s Power/Interest Matrix was used to map stakeholders and a SWOT analysis was conducted using ExpandNet/WHO Framework to evaluate contextual factors and identify levers and obstacles influencing the scale-up. Results A total of 23 participants were involved. Health authorities had high power and generally high interest, while implementers and recipients had lower power and different interest levels. National engagement for WHO E2025 or E2030 enhanced scalability and represented a main opportunity in the three countries. Nevertheless, several regulatory and administrative aspects were identified as potential obstacles to be addressed to make scale-up realistic. Funding was also a major concern for sustainability. The need for regional cooperation was emphasized to achieve malaria elimination. Lessons Despite financial and regulatory challenges, a window of opportunity is open to scale-up Curema. Identifying and involving stakeholders in a pre-planning assessment and advocating for foster regional cooperation are crucial steps to support the scale-up. Stakeholder analysis should be refined during the scaling-up to capture further changes in factors that might influence the process. Key messages • Engagements with WHO represent windows of opportunity to enhance Curema scale-up. • Stakeholder involvement and regional cooperation are crucial for scaling up Curema in Brazil, French Guiana and Suriname.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.2157
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing contextual factors influencing scale-up: a interactive approach involving stakeholders

Maylis Douine, Y. Lambert, Stephen Vreden, Martha Cecília Suárez-Mútis et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
0.49
article

Assessing contextual factors influencing scale-up: a interactive approach involving stakeholders

Maylis Douine, Y. Lambert, Stephen Vreden, Martha Cecília Suárez-Mútis, Cristiane Carboni, Alice Sanna, Teddy Bardon, Lorraine Plessis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Issue Pilot interventions are not always put into practice at scale. When they are, effectiveness is often highly reduced in the field due to contextual factors. To effectively implement a scale-up, stakeholders’ involvement is crucial. Curema is an international research evaluating an intervention aiming to reduce malaria transmission by distributing RDTs and treatments in mobile hard-to-reach populations. This intervention might be scaled-up in Brazil, Suriname, and French Guiana as a tool of national malaria programs for specific areas and populations. Description of the problem An interactive pre-planning assessment was conducted involving key stakeholders -implementers, decision-makers, and researchers - in working sessions, semi-structured interviews, and formal meetings. Mendelow’s Power/Interest Matrix was used to map stakeholders and a SWOT analysis was conducted using ExpandNet/WHO Framework to evaluate contextual factors and identify levers and obstacles influencing the scale-up. Results A total of 23 participants were involved. Health authorities had high power and generally high interest, while implementers and recipients had lower power and different interest levels. National engagement for WHO E2025 or E2030 enhanced scalability and represented a main opportunity in the three countries. Nevertheless, several regulatory and administrative aspects were identified as potential obstacles to be addressed to make scale-up realistic. Funding was also a major concern for sustainability. The need for regional cooperation was emphasized to achieve malaria elimination. Lessons Despite financial and regulatory challenges, a window of opportunity is open to scale-up Curema. Identifying and involving stakeholders in a pre-planning assessment and advocating for foster regional cooperation are crucial steps to support the scale-up. Stakeholder analysis should be refined during the scaling-up to capture further changes in factors that might influence the process. Key messages • Engagements with WHO represent windows of opportunity to enhance Curema scale-up. • Stakeholder involvement and regional cooperation are crucial for scaling up Curema in Brazil, French Guiana and Suriname.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Inserm (FR), Multi Electrical System (Suriname) (SR), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (BR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.