Implementation of the international health regulations – global challenges and the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract The International Health Regulations (IHR) govern how 196 countries and the World Health Organization (WHO) collectively manage global disease spread while preserving international travel and commercial trade. The COVID-19 pandemic set an unprecedented challenge to the IHR commitments. To address this gap, two scoping reviews were conducted: one identifying global challenges in IHR implementation and the other analyzing challenges, successes and limitations of the IHR during the COVID-19 pandemic. The scoping reviews followed Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and PRISMA methodology, utilizing the PubMed, Medline, World of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases, plus backwards citation chaining. Data selection and analysis were guided by pretest forms. From 128 articles screened, 52 met inclusion criteria for the IHR implementation review. 135 challenges were identified, in these categories: (1) requirement of financial and technical resources, (2) lack of enforcement and accountability mechanisms, (3) need for rules clarification, (4) deterrents to reporting, (5) inadequate governance, (6) insufficient cooperation between countries, (7) sovereignty issues, (8) scarcity of guidance and technical support from WHO, (9) lack of inclusion of roles for relevant non-state actors, (10) conflicts and emergencies. In the COVID-19 review, 15 articles were included. Although the role of the IHR during Health Emergencies was acknowledged, most countries faced limitations in its implementation during the pandemic. Key lessons included reinforcing the global health security strategy, reviewing the IHR to address current challenges and strengthening countries and states’ commitment to resolutions compliance. The ongoing debate over IHR updates confirms the need for its revision to safeguard global health. A more effective response grounded on the IHR is needed to face upcoming and expected events of COVID-19’s magnitude and severity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.765
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of the international health regulations – global challenges and the COVID-19 pandemic

Eunice Crisóstomo, Joana Miguel Carvalho, Francisca Pulido Valente, Daniel Saldanha Resendes et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Implementation of the international health regulations – global challenges and the COVID-19 pandemic

Eunice Crisóstomo, Joana Miguel Carvalho, Francisca Pulido Valente, Daniel Saldanha Resendes, Hélder Pinto, Rafael Vasconcelos, Miguel M. Santos, Sara Barroso Travassos, Manuel Godinho
article en

Abstract

Abstract The International Health Regulations (IHR) govern how 196 countries and the World Health Organization (WHO) collectively manage global disease spread while preserving international travel and commercial trade. The COVID-19 pandemic set an unprecedented challenge to the IHR commitments. To address this gap, two scoping reviews were conducted: one identifying global challenges in IHR implementation and the other analyzing challenges, successes and limitations of the IHR during the COVID-19 pandemic. The scoping reviews followed Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and PRISMA methodology, utilizing the PubMed, Medline, World of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases, plus backwards citation chaining. Data selection and analysis were guided by pretest forms. From 128 articles screened, 52 met inclusion criteria for the IHR implementation review. 135 challenges were identified, in these categories: (1) requirement of financial and technical resources, (2) lack of enforcement and accountability mechanisms, (3) need for rules clarification, (4) deterrents to reporting, (5) inadequate governance, (6) insufficient cooperation between countries, (7) sovereignty issues, (8) scarcity of guidance and technical support from WHO, (9) lack of inclusion of roles for relevant non-state actors, (10) conflicts and emergencies. In the COVID-19 review, 15 articles were included. Although the role of the IHR during Health Emergencies was acknowledged, most countries faced limitations in its implementation during the pandemic. Key lessons included reinforcing the global health security strategy, reviewing the IHR to address current challenges and strengthening countries and states’ commitment to resolutions compliance. The ongoing debate over IHR updates confirms the need for its revision to safeguard global health. A more effective response grounded on the IHR is needed to face upcoming and expected events of COVID-19’s magnitude and severity.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (PT), Portuguese Environment Agency (PT), Unidade Local de Saúde de Entre Douro e Vouga (PT), Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa (PT), Hospital de Santa Maria (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.