Generating qualitative evidence of the validity of the Health Literacy Questionnaire Parent

Abstract Background Health literacy refers to the skills needed to access, understand, and navigate health information and services. The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) is a widely used validated measure of health literacy capturing nine distinct domains. The HLQ-Parent is a recent adaption of the HLQ which has been designed to capture the nuanced health literacy skills required by primary care givers of children. Generating qualitative evidence of validity of such tools is an important element of the validation process as it captures understanding and interpretation of items which is not achievable by quantitative methods alone. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to generate qualitative evidence of the validity of the HLQ-Parent. Methods A qualitative study implementing the HLQ-Parent during face-to-face cognitive interviews with concurrent probing was conducted. Primary carers of children aged 16 or under living in England were recruited via voluntary organisations supporting families. Qualitative data analysis was conducted on the audio recordings in the form of text summaries. Parents’ chosen HLQ-Parent responses were compared to their narrative responses and coded by the researcher as match, no match or unclear. Parents’ narrative responses were also compared to the HLQ-Parent item intent descriptions and coded as concordant, discordant, or unclear. Results Overall, participants (n = 9, mean age 40 years, 88.9% female) narrative responses matched to their chosen HLQ-Parent response, while their narrative responses were concordant with the HLQ-Parent item intent descriptions. Two participants narratives did not match their responses for the item:’ I have enough information to help me deal with my child’s health’. Conclusions The qualitative data provided evidence that participants understood and answered the HLQ-Parent items as intended. Study results contribute validity evidence for the use of HLQ-Parent to measure parental health literacy. Key messages • This study contributes evidence to the validity of the HLQ-Parent. • Qualitative methods provide valuable insights that enhance the overall understanding of health literacy measurement tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1668
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generating qualitative evidence of the validity of the Health Literacy Questionnaire Parent

James Faulkner, S Belfrage, Margaret Husted, Sanjay Patel et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Generating qualitative evidence of the validity of the Health Literacy Questionnaire Parent

James Faulkner, S Belfrage, Margaret Husted, Sanjay Patel, Simon Fraser
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Health literacy refers to the skills needed to access, understand, and navigate health information and services. The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) is a widely used validated measure of health literacy capturing nine distinct domains. The HLQ-Parent is a recent adaption of the HLQ which has been designed to capture the nuanced health literacy skills required by primary care givers of children. Generating qualitative evidence of validity of such tools is an important element of the validation process as it captures understanding and interpretation of items which is not achievable by quantitative methods alone. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to generate qualitative evidence of the validity of the HLQ-Parent. Methods A qualitative study implementing the HLQ-Parent during face-to-face cognitive interviews with concurrent probing was conducted. Primary carers of children aged 16 or under living in England were recruited via voluntary organisations supporting families. Qualitative data analysis was conducted on the audio recordings in the form of text summaries. Parents’ chosen HLQ-Parent responses were compared to their narrative responses and coded by the researcher as match, no match or unclear. Parents’ narrative responses were also compared to the HLQ-Parent item intent descriptions and coded as concordant, discordant, or unclear. Results Overall, participants (n = 9, mean age 40 years, 88.9% female) narrative responses matched to their chosen HLQ-Parent response, while their narrative responses were concordant with the HLQ-Parent item intent descriptions. Two participants narratives did not match their responses for the item:’ I have enough information to help me deal with my child’s health’. Conclusions The qualitative data provided evidence that participants understood and answered the HLQ-Parent items as intended. Study results contribute validity evidence for the use of HLQ-Parent to measure parental health literacy. Key messages • This study contributes evidence to the validity of the HLQ-Parent. • Qualitative methods provide valuable insights that enhance the overall understanding of health literacy measurement tools.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
University of Winchester (GB), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.