Picking a bone with fluoride – dose-response meta-analysis on exposure to fluoride and bone density

Abstract There are still uncertainties around the effects, beneficial and adverse, of water fluoride exposure on bone density and strength. We selected bone mineral density (BMD) for investigation as it is recognized as the major non-invasive indicator of bone strength, representing its clinical assessment standard. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to characterize for the first time the relation between fluoride exposure and BMD through a dose-response approach, using a one-stage dose-response meta-analysis based on a cubic spline random-effects model. Out of 1201 potentially relevant literature records retrieved, after removing duplicates, title/abstract screening, and full-text evaluation, 16 studies were eligible for this review, 12 of which were also suitable for the dose-response meta-analysis. We observed an almost linear association between fluoride and BMD, yielding a mean difference of 2.60 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.40) at 4 mg/L of fluoride exposure. This pattern was also confirmed for hip BMD (MD = 2.83; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.40 at 4 mg/L). However, sex-specific analyses showed different patterns of association. In males, the relation between fluoride exposure and BMD was almost linear until 0.75 mg/L (MD = 0.24; 95% CI -0.22to 0.37), after which it plateaued. Females showed a slight increased BMD at 1 mg/L (MD = 0.05; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.16) but decreasing values above 2.5 mg/L (MD=-0.22; 95% CI -2.72 to 2.38 at 4 mg/L), with an indication of an inverted U-shaped association. This pattern was clearer when we restricted our analysis to hip BMD (MD=-0.56; 95% CI -2.98 to 1.85 at 4 mg/L). Sensitivity analyses examining both bone-specific BMD and conducting risk of bias assessments are currently underway. Moreover, imprecision of the estimates, especially in stratified analyses, and potential for residual confounding, underscore the need for further prospective studies, to more adequately assess the relation between fluoride exposure and bone density and strength. Key messages • At fluoride exposure below 1 mg/L, we observed a linear correlation between fluoride exposure and increase bone density in the overall pooled dose-response analysis of eligible studies. • Sex-specific patterns: males show positive response until certain exposure threshold; while females demonstrate an increase only at low doses of exposure and a downward trend at higher exposures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1407
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluoride Effects and Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Picking a bone with fluoride – dose-response meta-analysis on exposure to fluoride and bone density

Riccardo Mazzoli, Tommaso Filippini, Lisa De Pasquale, Inga Iamandii et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Fluoride Effects and Removal
0.20
article

Picking a bone with fluoride – dose-response meta-analysis on exposure to fluoride and bone density

Riccardo Mazzoli, Tommaso Filippini, Lisa De Pasquale, Inga Iamandii, Marco Vinceti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract There are still uncertainties around the effects, beneficial and adverse, of water fluoride exposure on bone density and strength. We selected bone mineral density (BMD) for investigation as it is recognized as the major non-invasive indicator of bone strength, representing its clinical assessment standard. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to characterize for the first time the relation between fluoride exposure and BMD through a dose-response approach, using a one-stage dose-response meta-analysis based on a cubic spline random-effects model. Out of 1201 potentially relevant literature records retrieved, after removing duplicates, title/abstract screening, and full-text evaluation, 16 studies were eligible for this review, 12 of which were also suitable for the dose-response meta-analysis. We observed an almost linear association between fluoride and BMD, yielding a mean difference of 2.60 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.40) at 4 mg/L of fluoride exposure. This pattern was also confirmed for hip BMD (MD = 2.83; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.40 at 4 mg/L). However, sex-specific analyses showed different patterns of association. In males, the relation between fluoride exposure and BMD was almost linear until 0.75 mg/L (MD = 0.24; 95% CI -0.22to 0.37), after which it plateaued. Females showed a slight increased BMD at 1 mg/L (MD = 0.05; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.16) but decreasing values above 2.5 mg/L (MD=-0.22; 95% CI -2.72 to 2.38 at 4 mg/L), with an indication of an inverted U-shaped association. This pattern was clearer when we restricted our analysis to hip BMD (MD=-0.56; 95% CI -2.98 to 1.85 at 4 mg/L). Sensitivity analyses examining both bone-specific BMD and conducting risk of bias assessments are currently underway. Moreover, imprecision of the estimates, especially in stratified analyses, and potential for residual confounding, underscore the need for further prospective studies, to more adequately assess the relation between fluoride exposure and bone density and strength. Key messages • At fluoride exposure below 1 mg/L, we observed a linear correlation between fluoride exposure and increase bone density in the overall pooled dose-response analysis of eligible studies. • Sex-specific patterns: males show positive response until certain exposure threshold; while females demonstrate an increase only at low doses of exposure and a downward trend at higher exposures.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Boston University (US), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Berkeley Public Health Division (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Fluoride Effects and Removal
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.