8.Q. Skills building seminar: “The Church of Fail”: Learning from Our Mistakes in Co-Creation

Abstract When delving into the co-creation research literature, it might seem that researchers consistently attain success in their projects without any exceptions. At the extremes, co-creation might even be portrayed as a quasi-moral scientific approach, where the results are inherently positive and beneficial to all participants. Rarely do researchers openly discuss failures or mistakes encountered during co-creation projects, despite the well-established understanding that co-creation presents significant challenges and demands for those involved. Therefore, we aim to use the well-established “Church of Fail” method to underscore the importance of learning from failures, particularly within the dynamic and demanding landscape of co-creation. Therefore, we invite participants to embrace the inevitability of failures, emphasizing that the key lies in deriving valuable lessons from these. Failures present the greatest potential for professional growth and innovation. Reasons for the workshop: Ensuring the professional growth of researchers and practitioners is vital to unlocking the full potential of co-creation and participatory methodologies. It may appear that success in co-creation is guaranteed by applying principles such as building ownership or fostering shared understanding. However, in reality, co-creation demands significant effort, resources, and dedication from everyone involved. One way to avoid mistakes or failures is to embrace them and learn from them, thereby fostering professional growth and innovation. Objectives This workshop will: 1) Increase awareness of co-creation as a methodology within public health, by generating an open and safe learning environment for professional growth; 2) Exchange experiences with failure, to learn and encourage professional growth. The presenters will engage the participants with cases that illustrate different known pitfalls within co-creation, such as power imbalance, participation fatigue, recruitment strategies, and aligning objectives; 3) Discuss important consideration on co-creation approaches, to achieve the best possibility for success in such research projects in public health in the future. Key messages • Failure is not a flaw, but an opportunity to learn and innovate. • Success in co-creation is not a given, even though it sometimes seems so when reading the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.544
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8.Q. Skills building seminar: “The Church of Fail”: Learning from Our Mistakes in Co-Creation

Knud Ryom
European Journal of Public Health
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

8.Q. Skills building seminar: “The Church of Fail”: Learning from Our Mistakes in Co-Creation

Knud Ryom
article en

Abstract

Abstract When delving into the co-creation research literature, it might seem that researchers consistently attain success in their projects without any exceptions. At the extremes, co-creation might even be portrayed as a quasi-moral scientific approach, where the results are inherently positive and beneficial to all participants. Rarely do researchers openly discuss failures or mistakes encountered during co-creation projects, despite the well-established understanding that co-creation presents significant challenges and demands for those involved. Therefore, we aim to use the well-established “Church of Fail” method to underscore the importance of learning from failures, particularly within the dynamic and demanding landscape of co-creation. Therefore, we invite participants to embrace the inevitability of failures, emphasizing that the key lies in deriving valuable lessons from these. Failures present the greatest potential for professional growth and innovation. Reasons for the workshop: Ensuring the professional growth of researchers and practitioners is vital to unlocking the full potential of co-creation and participatory methodologies. It may appear that success in co-creation is guaranteed by applying principles such as building ownership or fostering shared understanding. However, in reality, co-creation demands significant effort, resources, and dedication from everyone involved. One way to avoid mistakes or failures is to embrace them and learn from them, thereby fostering professional growth and innovation. Objectives This workshop will: 1) Increase awareness of co-creation as a methodology within public health, by generating an open and safe learning environment for professional growth; 2) Exchange experiences with failure, to learn and encourage professional growth. The presenters will engage the participants with cases that illustrate different known pitfalls within co-creation, such as power imbalance, participation fatigue, recruitment strategies, and aligning objectives; 3) Discuss important consideration on co-creation approaches, to achieve the best possibility for success in such research projects in public health in the future. Key messages • Failure is not a flaw, but an opportunity to learn and innovate. • Success in co-creation is not a given, even though it sometimes seems so when reading the literature.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Department of Health Services (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.