In the Eye of AI: Conspiracies of Facial Recognition Software

The intersections of power and conspiracy rhetorics represent complexities for scholars who seek to understand social engagement and its various discursive properties. Our study addresses these complexities through the lens of facial recognition technology (FRT), analyzing how conversations on the platform X (formerly Twitter) surrounding FRT mirror discourse in other places that have been called conspiracy theories. By gathering Tweets that contain discourse about FRT and coding them using features synthesized from previous literature, we work to understand the ways that populations express valid feelings of disenfranchisement through traditionally conspiratorial rhetorical tropes. Our results highlight the importance of traditionally conspiratorial discursive features as legitimate means of critiquing powerful but obfuscated technologies and their roles in social systems. This research aims to provoke thought in the field of conspiracy by challenging scholars to consider what they would call a conspiracy theory and look deeper to see what features make it one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3641237.3691654
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In the Eye of AI: Conspiracies of Facial Recognition Software

Rachel Zimmer Schneider, Carleigh Davis, Kira Courtois
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

In the Eye of AI: Conspiracies of Facial Recognition Software

Rachel Zimmer Schneider, Carleigh Davis, Kira Courtois
article en

Abstract

The intersections of power and conspiracy rhetorics represent complexities for scholars who seek to understand social engagement and its various discursive properties. Our study addresses these complexities through the lens of facial recognition technology (FRT), analyzing how conversations on the platform X (formerly Twitter) surrounding FRT mirror discourse in other places that have been called conspiracy theories. By gathering Tweets that contain discourse about FRT and coding them using features synthesized from previous literature, we work to understand the ways that populations express valid feelings of disenfranchisement through traditionally conspiratorial rhetorical tropes. Our results highlight the importance of traditionally conspiratorial discursive features as legitimate means of critiquing powerful but obfuscated technologies and their roles in social systems. This research aims to provoke thought in the field of conspiracy by challenging scholars to consider what they would call a conspiracy theory and look deeper to see what features make it one.

Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.