The upfront lipid-lowering combination therapy of statins and ezetimibe vs statin monotherapy in the reduction of cardiovascular outcomes. A meta-analysis.

Abstract Background Despite some data in last few years, there is still some inconsistency concerning the effectiveness and safety of the upfront intensive lipid lowering combination therapy (LLT; of moderate to high intensity statin therapy and ezetimibe) in comparison to high intensity statin therapy and recommended by some guidelines stepwise therapy approach. Purpose We sought to evaluate the efficacy of combination LLT compared with statin monotherapy for cardiovascular outcomes, LDL-C reduction, and associated adverse events. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrial.gov to identify relevant articles published from inception until 29th December 2023. The outcomes were assessed using pooled odds ratio (OR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results A total of 11 studies (8 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies) with 106,358 were involved in the analysis. The mean age of the patients in the combination LLT and statin monotherapy group was 65.3 and 65.7 years, respectively. Pooled analysis shows that combination LLT significantly reduces the LDL-C level from the baseline (MD, -12.13 mg/dl [0.31 mmol/l] (95%CI: -18.26 to -5.99 mg/dl), p<0.001), all-cause mortality (ACM) (OR, 0.75, 95%CI: 0.62 to 0.92, p=0.01), cardiovascular mortality (CVM) (OR 0.75, 95%CI: 0.66 to 0.84, p<0.001), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR, 0.72 95%CI: 0.63 to 0.82, p<0.001), non-significant reduction in the incidence of stroke (OR 0.82, 95%CI: 0.66 to 1.01, p=0.06) when compared with statin monotherapy alone. Similarly, the therapy discontinuation rate was comparable between combination LLT and statin monotherapy groups (OR, 0.87 (95%CI: 0.53 to 1.40), p=0.56). The risk of adverse events related to the gastrointestinal tract (OR, 1.12 (95%CI: 0.93 to 1.36), p=0.23) and musculoskeletal system (OR, 0.88 (95%CI: 0.52 to 1.50), p=0.65) was comparable between both the groups of patients. Conclusion Combination LLT was associated with an overall greater reduction in LDL-C, a lower risk of ACM, MACE, and CVM compared to statin monotherapy alone.Forest Plot of desired outcomes.Central illustration with key findings.