Efficacy and severity of side-effects of rosuvastatin compared to other statins post-heart-transplantation

Abstract Introduction The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) 2022 guideline recommends statin therapy in heart transplantation (HTx) patients, with the therapeutic low-density lipoprotein (LDL) target being <2.5 mmol/L. Particularly pravastatin is recommended, given proven beneficial effects on long-term clinical outcome and the low prevalence of side effects. Yet, in the general population, rosuvastatin has been shown to be even more potent. Purpose We investigated the lipid-lowering effect and severity of side-effects of rosuvastatin compared to less potent statins in HTx patients. Methods In this before-after study, we included all HTx patients whom were prescribed a change from the statin they were using to rosuvastatin, for better cardiovascular risk management and/or because of side-effects, between February 2018 and February 2023. We evaluated the weight, lipid profile and side-effects (including myalgia, cramps, stiffness and weakness) of these patients up to one year prior to and after the statin change. At the same time, side-effects were measured in a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10, with the average score of side-effects utilized for analysis. We compared the differences using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results Out of 299 HTx patients, we included 114 patients, with a median age of 58 [IQR 50-67] years at switch of whom 31 (27%) were females. Median time since HTx was 9 [IQR 5-15] years. The distribution and dosage of prescribed statins before and after switch can be found in Table 1. Compared to statins used prior to therapy change, rosuvastatin was associated with lower total cholesterol, LDL- and triglyceride levels, with high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels remaining the same (Table 2). No difference in bodyweight was found (Table 2). Before switch, 41 (36%) patients achieved the target of LDL-levels below 2.5 mmol/L. After switch, 86 (75%) patients achieved the target of LDL levels below 2.5 mmol/L. Rosuvastatin shows a trend towards a lower prevalence of side-effects (Table 2). Conclusion In HTx patients that were prescribed a change of statin due to better cardiovascular risk management and/or complaints of side-effects, rosuvastatin is related to a more favorable lipid profile, without additional side-effects, compared to other statins. Furthermore, many more patients achieve the guideline recommended LDL-target. Ongoing research should determine whether this translates to a better clinical outcome.