Token Lifetimes and Security in OAuth 2.0: Best Practices and Emerging Trends

In networked and federated systems using OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect, tokens are essential for securely communicating between human and non-human entities without requiring the constant revalidation in every request. The improper management of these tokens, however, can expose systems to serious threats, such as token replay attacks. While the most secure practices involve real-time risk-based token revocation and sender-constrained tokens, organizations may not be ready for that, given the maturity of their security infrastructure. Developers and architects should consider the security benefits of using short-lived, narrowly scoped client-bound tokens designed to minimize the risk of misuse. By limiting the lifespan of tokens or binding them to specific clients (as in sender-constrained tokens), organizations can significantly reduce the attack surface and thwart token replay attempts. Identity practitioners must be aware of the limitations of long-lived tokens as well as the best practices for securing token-based systems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55621/idpro.108
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Token Lifetimes and Security in OAuth 2.0: Best Practices and Emerging Trends

1 citations
Library Science and Information Systems
0.78
article

Token Lifetimes and Security in OAuth 2.0: Best Practices and Emerging Trends

article en
1 citations

Abstract

In networked and federated systems using OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect, tokens are essential for securely communicating between human and non-human entities without requiring the constant revalidation in every request. The improper management of these tokens, however, can expose systems to serious threats, such as token replay attacks. While the most secure practices involve real-time risk-based token revocation and sender-constrained tokens, organizations may not be ready for that, given the maturity of their security infrastructure. Developers and architects should consider the security benefits of using short-lived, narrowly scoped client-bound tokens designed to minimize the risk of misuse. By limiting the lifespan of tokens or binding them to specific clients (as in sender-constrained tokens), organizations can significantly reduce the attack surface and thwart token replay attempts. Identity practitioners must be aware of the limitations of long-lived tokens as well as the best practices for securing token-based systems.

Vol. 1(15)
Wipro (Singapore) (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Library Science and Information Systems
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.