Clinical and angiographic features of patients experiencing exercise-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Abstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a devastating condition that exhibits significant clinical heterogeneity. Previous studies have reported coronary artery disease (CAD) as the most common cause of OHCA. Possible causes of exercise-induced OHCA in patients with CAD include ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI), exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia and other triggers. We investigated whether there are differences in the clinical and angiographic features between 'exercise-induced (EX)' and 'non-exercise-induced (non-EX)' OHCA secondary to CAD. Methods In total, resuscitated 2300 patients (from 72 institutions) with OHCA due to CAD were registered within our regional CCU network database between 2010 and 2021. The population of the coverage area is 16.8 million during the day and 14.1 million at night. Patients with a trigger were grouped based on their triggering event: at rest, sleeping, eating, drinking, watching television, bathing, excretion, mild physical activity, driving, exercise and other activity. We classified the patients into 2 groups based on their triggering event as exercise: exercise (EX) group(n=169) and Non-Ex group(n=2131). The primary clinical outcome of interest was favorable 30-day neuroprognosis. Results Baseline characteristics was shown in the Table (below). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was the most common type of clinical presentation in each group. In ACS, the EX group had less ST elevation and/or left bundle branch block in electrocardiogram (57% vs. 68%; P=0.01), and initial good flow (TIMI grade 3) of culprit lesion in coronary artery was more frequently seen in the EX group than in the Non-EX group (23% vs. 12%; P< 0.01). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that EX group had favorable clinical outcome compared with Non-EX group (71% vs 58%, p<0.001:log-rank test). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that exercise-related trigger for OHCA was an independent predictor of favorable outcome (OR:0.59, 95%CI:0.38-0.90; P=0.015). Conclusion EX-OHCA had favorable clinical outcome compared with non-EX-OHCA. Reason may be that these patient present with culprit lesion that has good blood flow, possibly leading to fewer STEMI events.Baseline charactaristicComparison in Patients with ACS