Comparative study of the effects of preferential left ventricular and biventricular pacing on echocardiographic and cardiorespiratory indices and clinical status of heart failure patients: preliminary

Abstract Introduction Nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been related with right ventricular dysfunction. Preferential left ventricular pacing (pLV-P) can achieve left ventricle resynchronization allowing for intrinsic activation of the right side, and benefit cardiac output while reducing atrial fibrillation occurrence. Moreover, the AdaptivCRT® algorithm also automatically adjusts interventricular (V-V) delay every minute. Methods We evaluated the effects of a pLVP algorithm on 100 systolic heart failure patients ( all Caucasians, 49% male; 67 +/- 8 years old; 51% ischemic cardiomyopathy; 44% diabetics; NYHA II-III) following randomization to standard biventricular pacing and pLVP, on echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary exercise test indices of functional status. Device programming was based on echocardiography-evaluated maximization of stroke volume and subsequent interventricular and atrioventricular delay adjustments delegated to the device. The follow-up consisted of 6 and 12-months visits; after the 1rst month of optimizing maximum CRT response. Results Significant comparative effects of pLV-P over optimized CRT were noted regarding right ventricle systolic velocity in TDI at 12-months from baseline (mean (SE); 4.5(0.8), p=0.035); decrease in end-diastolic volume of left ventricle (mean (SE); 11.33(7), p=0.035); decrease in right ventricle strain mean ((SE); 9.2(2.1), p=0.03). According to other echocardiographic indices, again taking into account baseline levels, patients in pLV-P group exhibited lower E/e value at 6-months (mean (SE); 8.390(4,3), p=0.04), and at 12 -months (mean (SE); 7.45(3.9), p=0.035); improved values in left atrium contractility strain at 12-months (mean (SE); 8.390(0.8), p=0.04); a borderline improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (mean (SE); 8.7(433), p=0.05) at 12-months; and borderline improvement in left ventricular longitudinal strain at 6-months (mean (SE); 4.9(2.6), p=0.035), compared to optimized CRT. In CPET, taking into account baseline levels, patients in the pLVP group showed higher METs at 12-months (mean (SE); 1,16(0.8), p=0.03) compared to opt CRT group; higher predicted Ventilation rate (%) even from 6-months (mean (SE); 8.167(5,7), p=0.03) and higher predicted peak VO2 (%) at 6 months (mean (SE); 34,13(14), p=0.03) and borderline significance at 12 months (mean (SE); 4.88(3), p=0.08), compared to opt CRT. Conclusions In the preliminary findings of READAPT study, it seems that pLVP optimized by a standardized echocardiographic protocol in patients with preserved AV conduction and LBBB, can achieve improvement in parameters of right ventricular and left atrium structure and function, as well as in survival-predictive parameters of CPET compared to optimized CRT during the 12-months of follow-up.