Development and Measurement Properties of the Danish Translation of the Groin Hernia-Q: Protocol for a Validation Study

Background: The patient reported outcome questionnaire Abdominal Hernia-Q is probably the most thoroughly validated patient-reported outcome measure specifically developed for patients undergoing ventral hernia repair. The present study aims to adapt and validate the Danish translation of the Abdominal Hernia-Q for patients undergoing groin hernia repair: the Groin Hernia-Q. Methods: This validation study will involve a total of 250 participants and it is divided into two substudies. Substudy 1 will focus on adapting the Abdominal Hernia-Q into the Groin Hernia-Q and assessing its content validity using the QQ-10 questionnaire. Substudy 2 will evaluate the structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error and construct validity of the Groin Hernia-Q, while also utilizing and comparing the results to the Carolinas Comfort Scale and Short-Form 12. Participants will be recruited both in a clinical setting and electronically. Data collection will be conducted through the platform Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). In addition to questionnaire data, this study will also involve perioperative and patient-related data extracted from the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish Hernia Database. This study is part of the AFTERHERNIA Project. Conclusion: This study will provide a comprehensive validation of the Groin Hernia-Q, ensuring it becomes a valuable tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing groin hernia repair. The questionnaire will contribute significantly to improved patient care through the AFTERHERNIA Project.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgery Research and Practice
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46889/jsrp.2024.5303
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Measurement Properties of the Danish Translation of the Groin Hernia-Q: Protocol for a Validation Study

Anders Gram‐Hanssen
Journal of Surgery Research and Practice
Hernia repair and management
article

Development and Measurement Properties of the Danish Translation of the Groin Hernia-Q: Protocol for a Validation Study

Anders Gram‐Hanssen
article en

Abstract

Background: The patient reported outcome questionnaire Abdominal Hernia-Q is probably the most thoroughly validated patient-reported outcome measure specifically developed for patients undergoing ventral hernia repair. The present study aims to adapt and validate the Danish translation of the Abdominal Hernia-Q for patients undergoing groin hernia repair: the Groin Hernia-Q. Methods: This validation study will involve a total of 250 participants and it is divided into two substudies. Substudy 1 will focus on adapting the Abdominal Hernia-Q into the Groin Hernia-Q and assessing its content validity using the QQ-10 questionnaire. Substudy 2 will evaluate the structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error and construct validity of the Groin Hernia-Q, while also utilizing and comparing the results to the Carolinas Comfort Scale and Short-Form 12. Participants will be recruited both in a clinical setting and electronically. Data collection will be conducted through the platform Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). In addition to questionnaire data, this study will also involve perioperative and patient-related data extracted from the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish Hernia Database. This study is part of the AFTERHERNIA Project. Conclusion: This study will provide a comprehensive validation of the Groin Hernia-Q, ensuring it becomes a valuable tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing groin hernia repair. The questionnaire will contribute significantly to improved patient care through the AFTERHERNIA Project.

Journal of Surgery Research and Practice
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.