Both fibrosis-4 index and fibrosis-5 index can predict the prognosis of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Backgrounds: The Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and Fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) index are non-invasive indicators reflecting liver fibrosis. Previous studies show their association with acute heart failure and myocardial infarction prognosis. However, there are few reports on the relationship between the two indices and the prognosis of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose This study aims to explore and compare the predictive value of both indices for PCI patient prognosis. Method Data for this study were obtained from a retrospective cohort comprising patients admitted to and discharge d from 72 secondary and tertiary hospitals between 2010 and 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised patients undergoing PCI during hospitalization. The initial test results of these patients after admission were collected, and the FIB-4 (FIB-4 = age (years) × aspartate aminotransferase (AST [U/L]) / (platelets [10^9/L] × alanine aminotransferase [ALT {U/L}]½) and FIB-5 (FIB-5 = [albumin (g/L) × 0.3 + platelet count (10^9/L) × 0.05] - [alkaline phosphatase (U/L) × 0.014 + AST/ALT ratio × 6 + 14]) indices were calculated. Patients were divided into low (N = 83082), medium (N = 16618), and high (N = 7932) FIB-4 groups, as well as low (N = 18642), medium (N = 12106), and high (N = 76884) FIB-5 groups based on predefined cutoff values. The primary endpoint was one-year cardiovascular mortality, with secondary endpoints including one-year all-cause mortality and one-year recurrent myocardial infarction. Results The study included 107,632 patients after PCI whose FIB-4 index and FIB-5 index could be simultaneously calculated during hospitalization. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that compared to the low FIB-4 group, both the high FIB-4 group (aHR 1.935; 95%CI 1.592-2.353) and the medium FIB-4 group (aHR 1.487; 95%CI 1.251-1.768) had an increased risk of one-year cardiovascular death (P0.05). Conclusions The present study indicated that both FIB-4 and FIB-5 could be used to predict the prognosis of patients after PCI. High FIB-4 index and low FIB-5 index were predictive factors for 1-year cardiovascular death, 1-year all-cause death, and 1-year recurrent myocardial infarction in patients after PCI, with no statistical difference in predictive value between the two.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2390
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Both fibrosis-4 index and fibrosis-5 index can predict the prognosis of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

C Jiang, Xiang Wu, Kefei Chen, Tao Liu et al.
1 citations
European Heart Journal
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
0.40
article

Both fibrosis-4 index and fibrosis-5 index can predict the prognosis of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

C Jiang, Xiang Wu, Kefei Chen, Tao Liu, J Y Wang, Xianfeng Liu, Tao Gu, Yongkui Zhang, S T Hu, J K Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Backgrounds: The Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and Fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) index are non-invasive indicators reflecting liver fibrosis. Previous studies show their association with acute heart failure and myocardial infarction prognosis. However, there are few reports on the relationship between the two indices and the prognosis of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose This study aims to explore and compare the predictive value of both indices for PCI patient prognosis. Method Data for this study were obtained from a retrospective cohort comprising patients admitted to and discharge d from 72 secondary and tertiary hospitals between 2010 and 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised patients undergoing PCI during hospitalization. The initial test results of these patients after admission were collected, and the FIB-4 (FIB-4 = age (years) × aspartate aminotransferase (AST [U/L]) / (platelets [10^9/L] × alanine aminotransferase [ALT {U/L}]½) and FIB-5 (FIB-5 = [albumin (g/L) × 0.3 + platelet count (10^9/L) × 0.05] - [alkaline phosphatase (U/L) × 0.014 + AST/ALT ratio × 6 + 14]) indices were calculated. Patients were divided into low (N = 83082), medium (N = 16618), and high (N = 7932) FIB-4 groups, as well as low (N = 18642), medium (N = 12106), and high (N = 76884) FIB-5 groups based on predefined cutoff values. The primary endpoint was one-year cardiovascular mortality, with secondary endpoints including one-year all-cause mortality and one-year recurrent myocardial infarction. Results The study included 107,632 patients after PCI whose FIB-4 index and FIB-5 index could be simultaneously calculated during hospitalization. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that compared to the low FIB-4 group, both the high FIB-4 group (aHR 1.935; 95%CI 1.592-2.353) and the medium FIB-4 group (aHR 1.487; 95%CI 1.251-1.768) had an increased risk of one-year cardiovascular death (P0.05). Conclusions The present study indicated that both FIB-4 and FIB-5 could be used to predict the prognosis of patients after PCI. High FIB-4 index and low FIB-5 index were predictive factors for 1-year cardiovascular death, 1-year all-cause death, and 1-year recurrent myocardial infarction in patients after PCI, with no statistical difference in predictive value between the two.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
University of California, San Francisco (US), Global Brain Health Institute (US), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.