Coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure: observations from the MICRO registry

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of hospitalization in the elderly. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), among other risk factors, is linked to the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of HF. Purpose This abstract aims to summarize key findings from a comprehensive analysis of CMD in subgroups of HF, shedding light on its association with hemodynamic parameters. Methods Patients experiencing recurrent angina (CCS II-IV) and no relevant epicardial stenosis were enrolled in a prospective registry (MICRO). Epicardial and microvascular responses (pressure, resistance and flow) were assessed at rest and during adenosine and acetylcholine testing. The impact of an elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in the absence of clinical signs of HF was also investigated. Results Overall, 188 patients (63% (118) women, mean age 65±11 years) with angina and no epicardial stenosis were enrolled. Patients with HF (n=26) displayed lower hyperemic flow in response to endothelium-independent adenosine (5.2±3.1 vs. 7.3±4.4; P=0.004), lower coronary flow reserve (2.9±1.5 vs. 4.4±1.1; P<0.001) and microvascular resistance reserve (3.3±2.1 vs. 5.2±2.7; P<0.001), and increased microvascular resistance during adenosine-induced hyperemia (25±21 vs. 17±11; P=0.045). An increased LVEDP without clinical signs of HF was not associated with a lower coronary flow reserve (4.3±1.9 vs. 2.6±1.2; P=0.006) or microvascular resistance reserve (4.9±2.1 vs. 2.8±1.7; P=0.004). Microvascular resistance during acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent)-induced hyperemia was lower in HF patients (36.2±23.5 vs. 57.4±37.8; P=0.018). Conclusion(s) Patients with heart failure displayed signs of impaired microvascular endothelium-independent responses while endothelium-dependent reactivity appears to be maintained. An elevated LVEDP without clinical HF was not associated with impaired coronary microvascular function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2358
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure: observations from the MICRO registry

T. Gori, Maximilian Peter Brandt, M Knorr, Jutta Herzog et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure: observations from the MICRO registry

T. Gori, Maximilian Peter Brandt, M Knorr, Jutta Herzog, Karl‐Patrik Kresoja, Katharina Schnitzler, Philipp Lurz, Ornela Velollari, P Wenzel, Maximilian Olschweski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of hospitalization in the elderly. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), among other risk factors, is linked to the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of HF. Purpose This abstract aims to summarize key findings from a comprehensive analysis of CMD in subgroups of HF, shedding light on its association with hemodynamic parameters. Methods Patients experiencing recurrent angina (CCS II-IV) and no relevant epicardial stenosis were enrolled in a prospective registry (MICRO). Epicardial and microvascular responses (pressure, resistance and flow) were assessed at rest and during adenosine and acetylcholine testing. The impact of an elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in the absence of clinical signs of HF was also investigated. Results Overall, 188 patients (63% (118) women, mean age 65±11 years) with angina and no epicardial stenosis were enrolled. Patients with HF (n=26) displayed lower hyperemic flow in response to endothelium-independent adenosine (5.2±3.1 vs. 7.3±4.4; P=0.004), lower coronary flow reserve (2.9±1.5 vs. 4.4±1.1; P<0.001) and microvascular resistance reserve (3.3±2.1 vs. 5.2±2.7; P<0.001), and increased microvascular resistance during adenosine-induced hyperemia (25±21 vs. 17±11; P=0.045). An increased LVEDP without clinical signs of HF was not associated with a lower coronary flow reserve (4.3±1.9 vs. 2.6±1.2; P=0.006) or microvascular resistance reserve (4.9±2.1 vs. 2.8±1.7; P=0.004). Microvascular resistance during acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent)-induced hyperemia was lower in HF patients (36.2±23.5 vs. 57.4±37.8; P=0.018). Conclusion(s) Patients with heart failure displayed signs of impaired microvascular endothelium-independent responses while endothelium-dependent reactivity appears to be maintained. An elevated LVEDP without clinical HF was not associated with impaired coronary microvascular function.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.