To compare 24 hour blood pressure values of a conventional 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure device versus a wristband using an artificial intelligence algorithm based on photophletysmography

Abstract Background Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring is of high added value in determining blood pressure, but also highly relevant quantitatively, as hypertension is the single most common medical condition. Unfortunately, practical and qualitative limitations are numerous. Purpose To determine the accuracy of a novel wrist-worn cuff-calibrated photoplethysmography (PPG)-based remote patient monitoring device versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods The single-center prospective study included 40 adult patients with standard 24-hour ABPM with a 30-minute measurements. Participants used a wrist-worn PPG device during the ABPM period. Measurements of the average difference and standard deviation (SD) for the full 24-hour period as well as for awake and asleep periods were compared. Differences in awake-asleep BP change between the investigational and reference device were described for all, and per nighttime BP dipper category. And also, investigational BP monitoring accuracy under motion will be visualised. Results During the 24-hour period the absolute difference in average SBP and DBP was 3.65 (SD±4.57) and 2.98 (SD±3.91), respectively. Similar results were found for the subsets of day- and nighttime determinations. The absolute difference in average awake-asleep BP change was 2.36 (SD ± 2.40) for SBP and 2.17 (SD ± 2.13) for DBP. Comparable absolute differences were present within each of the nighttime dipper categories. The performance of the investigational device remained stable during motion. Conclusions This study demonstrates initial evidence supporting the accuracy of the evaluated wrist-worn PPG-based device in measuring 24-hour as well as day- and nighttime BP. In the average difference and SD remained within ISO-81060-2:2018 cut-off values from recent ESH guidelines. Therefore, the presented method can provide an accurate and more patient friendly alternative to ABPM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3455
Primary Topic
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To compare 24 hour blood pressure values of a conventional 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure device versus a wristband using an artificial intelligence algorithm based on photophletysmography

Jan Constandse, Eelko Ronner, Hendrieke C. Hoftijzer, J Schipper et al.
European Heart Journal
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
article

To compare 24 hour blood pressure values of a conventional 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure device versus a wristband using an artificial intelligence algorithm based on photophletysmography

Jan Constandse, Eelko Ronner, Hendrieke C. Hoftijzer, J Schipper, Stefan H. J. Monnink, M. van Vliet, Arnaud D. Hauer, P Van Bronswijk
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring is of high added value in determining blood pressure, but also highly relevant quantitatively, as hypertension is the single most common medical condition. Unfortunately, practical and qualitative limitations are numerous. Purpose To determine the accuracy of a novel wrist-worn cuff-calibrated photoplethysmography (PPG)-based remote patient monitoring device versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods The single-center prospective study included 40 adult patients with standard 24-hour ABPM with a 30-minute measurements. Participants used a wrist-worn PPG device during the ABPM period. Measurements of the average difference and standard deviation (SD) for the full 24-hour period as well as for awake and asleep periods were compared. Differences in awake-asleep BP change between the investigational and reference device were described for all, and per nighttime BP dipper category. And also, investigational BP monitoring accuracy under motion will be visualised. Results During the 24-hour period the absolute difference in average SBP and DBP was 3.65 (SD±4.57) and 2.98 (SD±3.91), respectively. Similar results were found for the subsets of day- and nighttime determinations. The absolute difference in average awake-asleep BP change was 2.36 (SD ± 2.40) for SBP and 2.17 (SD ± 2.13) for DBP. Comparable absolute differences were present within each of the nighttime dipper categories. The performance of the investigational device remained stable during motion. Conclusions This study demonstrates initial evidence supporting the accuracy of the evaluated wrist-worn PPG-based device in measuring 24-hour as well as day- and nighttime BP. In the average difference and SD remained within ISO-81060-2:2018 cut-off values from recent ESH guidelines. Therefore, the presented method can provide an accurate and more patient friendly alternative to ABPM.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Reinier de Graaf Hospital (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.