Analysis of safety and outcome of use of NOAC in intracardiac thrombi over warfarin

Abstract Introduction Intracardiac clots occur in 15- 25% of patients post myocardial infarction and in patient with atrial fibrillation. It holds poor outcome if not treated with anticoagulation. Warfarin remains the drug of choice in such patients, however recently according to the newly published data, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has recommended non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant (NOAC) for intracardiac clots as a class 2A recommendation. There is no documented data in the region of the gulf regarding the use of NOAC in intracardiac clots. Aim We aim in this study to evaluate the use of NOAC in the treatment of intracardiac clots over warfarin, by studying the effectiveness, safety and associated complications. Methodology A retrospective cohort study from April 2017 to December 2023 was conducted of patient’s above 18 years old who have a documented intracardiac clot on echocardiography. The patient were grouped into patients discharged on NOAC and those discharged on warfarin. The participants were studied for resolution of clot and development of complication; death, bleeding and thrombosis. Results A total of 253 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Out of which 45 ( 18%) patients were discharged on NOAC and 208 (82%) on warfarin. The two groups had similar demographics with equally mean age of 71 years old , 89% being males, 38% hypertensive and most common clot in the left ventricle in both groups. From those patients with documented follow up ( NOAC 45% average of 8 months, Warfarin 62% average of 7 months); 48% in the NOAC group had a documented resolution of the clot while 44% in the warfarin group had a documented resolution of the intracardiac clot.(p value of 0.7) The median resolution time in the NOAC group was 4 months while in the warfarin group 3.5 months. Bleeding occurred in 19% and mortality rate was 5% in NOAC group, while in the warfarin group 10% developed bleeding and mortality rate was 6%. Conclusion Our data pointed out the safety of NOAC as a reasonable alternative to warfarin inpatient with intracardiac clots emphasizing the ESC recommendation in this regards. We recommend a randomized studies to prove the superiority of NOAC as anticoagulation of choice in intracardiac thrombi.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.362
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of safety and outcome of use of NOAC in intracardiac thrombi over warfarin

Mohamed Aboalela Elberry, OmarYousef Al-Assaf, Salah Aldeen Roqia, Miral Abumuaileq et al.
European Heart Journal
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Analysis of safety and outcome of use of NOAC in intracardiac thrombi over warfarin

Mohamed Aboalela Elberry, OmarYousef Al-Assaf, Salah Aldeen Roqia, Miral Abumuaileq, Adesola Z. Musa, Basel Baaj
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Intracardiac clots occur in 15- 25% of patients post myocardial infarction and in patient with atrial fibrillation. It holds poor outcome if not treated with anticoagulation. Warfarin remains the drug of choice in such patients, however recently according to the newly published data, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has recommended non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant (NOAC) for intracardiac clots as a class 2A recommendation. There is no documented data in the region of the gulf regarding the use of NOAC in intracardiac clots. Aim We aim in this study to evaluate the use of NOAC in the treatment of intracardiac clots over warfarin, by studying the effectiveness, safety and associated complications. Methodology A retrospective cohort study from April 2017 to December 2023 was conducted of patient’s above 18 years old who have a documented intracardiac clot on echocardiography. The patient were grouped into patients discharged on NOAC and those discharged on warfarin. The participants were studied for resolution of clot and development of complication; death, bleeding and thrombosis. Results A total of 253 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Out of which 45 ( 18%) patients were discharged on NOAC and 208 (82%) on warfarin. The two groups had similar demographics with equally mean age of 71 years old , 89% being males, 38% hypertensive and most common clot in the left ventricle in both groups. From those patients with documented follow up ( NOAC 45% average of 8 months, Warfarin 62% average of 7 months); 48% in the NOAC group had a documented resolution of the clot while 44% in the warfarin group had a documented resolution of the intracardiac clot.(p value of 0.7) The median resolution time in the NOAC group was 4 months while in the warfarin group 3.5 months. Bleeding occurred in 19% and mortality rate was 5% in NOAC group, while in the warfarin group 10% developed bleeding and mortality rate was 6%. Conclusion Our data pointed out the safety of NOAC as a reasonable alternative to warfarin inpatient with intracardiac clots emphasizing the ESC recommendation in this regards. We recommend a randomized studies to prove the superiority of NOAC as anticoagulation of choice in intracardiac thrombi.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Rashid Hospital (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.