Prognostic implications of genotype findings in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a network meta-analysis

Abstract Background Evidence on the relative impact of diverse genetic backgrounds associated with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains contradictory. Aim This study sought to synthesize the available data regarding long-term outcomes of different gene groups in DCM. Methods Electronic databases were systematically screened to identify studies reporting prognostic data on pre-specified gene groups. Those included pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants, truncating titin variants (TTNtv), lamin A/C mutations (LMNA), and desmosomal proteins. Outcomes were divided into composite adverse events (CAEs), major ventricular arrhythmic events (MVAEs) and heart failure events (HFEs). Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to quantify the pooled odds ratio (ORs) for each gene group. A frequentist network meta-analysis was executed to allow indirect within-gene group comparisons. Results Twenty-six studies comprising 7,255 genotyped DCM individuals were included. Patients with P/PL variants had a higher risk for CAEs [OR, 2.10 (95% CI, 1.67-2.65)], MVAEs [OR, 1.86 (95% CI, 1.52-2.26)], and HFEs [OR, 2.01 (95% CI, 1.08-3.73)] than genotype negative patients. The presence of TTNtv was linked to a higher risk for CAEs [OR, 1.78 (95% CI, 1.20-2.63)], but not MVAEs or HFEs. LMNA and desmosomal groups suffered a higher risk for CAEs, MVAEs, and HFEs compared to non-LMNA and non-desmosomal groups respectively (Picture 1). When genes were indirectly compared, the presence of LMNA resulted in a more detrimental effect that TTNtv, with respect to all composite outcomes but no significant difference was found between LMNA and desmosomal genes. Desmosomal genes harbored a higher risk for MVAEs compared to TTNtv (Picture 2). Conclusion Different genetic substrates associated with DCM result in divergent natural histories. Routine utilization of genetic testing should be employed to refine risk stratification and inform therapeutic strategies in DCM.Natural history of DCM based on genotypeNetwork meta-analysis of gene variants

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.894
Primary Topic
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic implications of genotype findings in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a network meta-analysis

Antonios Ziakas, V Anastasiou, Pavlos Rouskas, Stylianos Daios et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
article

Prognostic implications of genotype findings in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a network meta-analysis

Antonios Ziakas, V Anastasiou, Pavlos Rouskas, Stylianos Daios, Sotiris Katranas, Thomas Zegkos, Dimitrios V. Moysidis, Αndreas S. Papazoglou, Thomas Gossios, Ourania Koutsiouroumpa, Vasileios Kamperidis, Georgios Tziomalos, Georgios Efthimiadis, T K Karamitsos, Despina Parcharidou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Evidence on the relative impact of diverse genetic backgrounds associated with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains contradictory. Aim This study sought to synthesize the available data regarding long-term outcomes of different gene groups in DCM. Methods Electronic databases were systematically screened to identify studies reporting prognostic data on pre-specified gene groups. Those included pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants, truncating titin variants (TTNtv), lamin A/C mutations (LMNA), and desmosomal proteins. Outcomes were divided into composite adverse events (CAEs), major ventricular arrhythmic events (MVAEs) and heart failure events (HFEs). Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to quantify the pooled odds ratio (ORs) for each gene group. A frequentist network meta-analysis was executed to allow indirect within-gene group comparisons. Results Twenty-six studies comprising 7,255 genotyped DCM individuals were included. Patients with P/PL variants had a higher risk for CAEs [OR, 2.10 (95% CI, 1.67-2.65)], MVAEs [OR, 1.86 (95% CI, 1.52-2.26)], and HFEs [OR, 2.01 (95% CI, 1.08-3.73)] than genotype negative patients. The presence of TTNtv was linked to a higher risk for CAEs [OR, 1.78 (95% CI, 1.20-2.63)], but not MVAEs or HFEs. LMNA and desmosomal groups suffered a higher risk for CAEs, MVAEs, and HFEs compared to non-LMNA and non-desmosomal groups respectively (Picture 1). When genes were indirectly compared, the presence of LMNA resulted in a more detrimental effect that TTNtv, with respect to all composite outcomes but no significant difference was found between LMNA and desmosomal genes. Desmosomal genes harbored a higher risk for MVAEs compared to TTNtv (Picture 2). Conclusion Different genetic substrates associated with DCM result in divergent natural histories. Routine utilization of genetic testing should be employed to refine risk stratification and inform therapeutic strategies in DCM.Natural history of DCM based on genotypeNetwork meta-analysis of gene variants

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
University of Ioannina (GR), AHEPA University Hospital (GR), 424 General Military Hospital (GR), Athens Naval & Veterans Hospital (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.