Predicting coastal wave conditions: A simple machine learning approach

Accurate and reliable nearshore wave predictions are highly valuable for a range of marine activities, including coastal engineering and maritime transport. However, in nearshore locations, predicting wave properties is challenging due to complex shallow water processes, requiring local wave models. This article develops an alternative data-driven framework to predict wave parameters (e.g. significant wave height) through the extension of wave buoy datasets using a trained Gaussian process regression (GPR — a supervised machine learning method). We present an easy-to-implement workflow, where the extensive range of input parameters (from ECMWF’s (1) ERA5 reanalysis and (2) IFS forecast global wave model, ≈ 50 km resolution) drives the development of GPR models. At five contrasting locations around the United Kingdom’s coastline, the GPR models produce wave predictions (forecast and hindcast) with low bias scores and strong correlations with observations. When compared to the global (ERA5 reanalysis) and a benchmark shelf-scale (Atlantic-European North West Shelf reanalysis; AENWS, 1 . 5 − 3 . 0 km resolution) model, the GPR hindcasts reduced significant wave height ( H s ) root-mean-squared error (RMSE) from 0.46 m (ERA5) and 0.21 m (AENWS) to 0.16 m (GPR). For the average zero-crossing wave period ( T z ) RMSE reduced from 1.46 s (ERA5) and 1.15 s (AENWS) to 0.58 s (GPR). Because our approach uses publicly available global data, it can be implemented at any historic or active buoy location. We provide proof of concept for an online forecast and hindcast tool which has the potential to improve accessibility to coastal wave predictions for many marine stakeholders. • Accurate wave hindcasts and forecasts are important for many marine activities. • Nearshore wave predictions often require bespoke local-scale wave models. • We present a simple machine learning workflow to predict coastal wave conditions. • Our results were more accurate than existing global-scale and shelf-scale wave models. • Proof of concept is provided for an machine learning-based forecast and hindcast tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ocean Research
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2024.104282
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting coastal wave conditions: A simple machine learning approach

Simon P. Neill, David Christie, Edward Roome
10 citations
Applied Ocean Research
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
2.06
article

Predicting coastal wave conditions: A simple machine learning approach

Simon P. Neill, David Christie, Edward Roome
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Accurate and reliable nearshore wave predictions are highly valuable for a range of marine activities, including coastal engineering and maritime transport. However, in nearshore locations, predicting wave properties is challenging due to complex shallow water processes, requiring local wave models. This article develops an alternative data-driven framework to predict wave parameters (e.g. significant wave height) through the extension of wave buoy datasets using a trained Gaussian process regression (GPR — a supervised machine learning method). We present an easy-to-implement workflow, where the extensive range of input parameters (from ECMWF’s (1) ERA5 reanalysis and (2) IFS forecast global wave model, ≈ 50 km resolution) drives the development of GPR models. At five contrasting locations around the United Kingdom’s coastline, the GPR models produce wave predictions (forecast and hindcast) with low bias scores and strong correlations with observations. When compared to the global (ERA5 reanalysis) and a benchmark shelf-scale (Atlantic-European North West Shelf reanalysis; AENWS, 1 . 5 − 3 . 0 km resolution) model, the GPR hindcasts reduced significant wave height ( H s ) root-mean-squared error (RMSE) from 0.46 m (ERA5) and 0.21 m (AENWS) to 0.16 m (GPR). For the average zero-crossing wave period ( T z ) RMSE reduced from 1.46 s (ERA5) and 1.15 s (AENWS) to 0.58 s (GPR). Because our approach uses publicly available global data, it can be implemented at any historic or active buoy location. We provide proof of concept for an online forecast and hindcast tool which has the potential to improve accessibility to coastal wave predictions for many marine stakeholders. • Accurate wave hindcasts and forecasts are important for many marine activities. • Nearshore wave predictions often require bespoke local-scale wave models. • We present a simple machine learning workflow to predict coastal wave conditions. • Our results were more accurate than existing global-scale and shelf-scale wave models. • Proof of concept is provided for an machine learning-based forecast and hindcast tool.

Applied Ocean ResearchVol. 153
Bangor University (GB)
Climate action, Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.