LVEF trajectory in HFimpEF and its association with prognosis

Abstract Background The 2021 revised Universal Definition of Heart Failure (HF) introduced the subgroup known as HF with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF), aiming to establish a standardized definition for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement and emphasize the importance of longitudinally assessment of LVEF. However, there remains an insufficient characterization of the association between serial LVEF trajectory before and after impEF, and outcomes in HFimpEF. Purpose We aim to delineate the LVEF trajectory in patients with impEF and to discern specific LVEF trajectory pattern that portends an unfavorable prognosis. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis by including hospitalized HF patients with baseline LVEF ≤ 40% and satisfactory serial echocardiographic follow-ups. ImpEF was defined as a follow-up LVEF measurement of > 40% with a ≥10-point increase from baseline. Longitudinal LVEF trajectories for patients with impEF (before and after LVEF improvement) were plotted according to the clinical outcome of all-cause death using Loess curves. LVEF changes over time were analyzed by unconditional non-linear mixed-effects modeling, and compared between the groups of patients who died and those who survived using conditional non-linear mixed-effects modeling. Results Among the initial 923 patients with reduced LVEF, 517 had impEF. According to Loess curves and non-linear mixed-effects analysis, LVEF trajectory of impEF differed according to the clinical outcome of death. For patients who suffered all-cause death, there was a comparatively limited improvement in LVEF followed by a more rapid plateauing and decline, exhibiting an inverted U-shaped pattern with lower LVEF values towards both ends of the distribution. Conclusions In HFimpEF, an inverted U-shaped trajectory of LVEF, characterized by limited initial improvement followed by subsequent decline, is associated with poorer prognosis. Serial LVEF monitoring in patients with HFimpEF could help with early identification of at-risk patients.Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.919
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LVEF trajectory in HFimpEF and its association with prognosis

Jian Zhang, Y. Zhang, L Huang
European Heart Journal
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

LVEF trajectory in HFimpEF and its association with prognosis

Jian Zhang, Y. Zhang, L Huang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The 2021 revised Universal Definition of Heart Failure (HF) introduced the subgroup known as HF with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF), aiming to establish a standardized definition for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement and emphasize the importance of longitudinally assessment of LVEF. However, there remains an insufficient characterization of the association between serial LVEF trajectory before and after impEF, and outcomes in HFimpEF. Purpose We aim to delineate the LVEF trajectory in patients with impEF and to discern specific LVEF trajectory pattern that portends an unfavorable prognosis. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis by including hospitalized HF patients with baseline LVEF ≤ 40% and satisfactory serial echocardiographic follow-ups. ImpEF was defined as a follow-up LVEF measurement of > 40% with a ≥10-point increase from baseline. Longitudinal LVEF trajectories for patients with impEF (before and after LVEF improvement) were plotted according to the clinical outcome of all-cause death using Loess curves. LVEF changes over time were analyzed by unconditional non-linear mixed-effects modeling, and compared between the groups of patients who died and those who survived using conditional non-linear mixed-effects modeling. Results Among the initial 923 patients with reduced LVEF, 517 had impEF. According to Loess curves and non-linear mixed-effects analysis, LVEF trajectory of impEF differed according to the clinical outcome of death. For patients who suffered all-cause death, there was a comparatively limited improvement in LVEF followed by a more rapid plateauing and decline, exhibiting an inverted U-shaped pattern with lower LVEF values towards both ends of the distribution. Conclusions In HFimpEF, an inverted U-shaped trajectory of LVEF, characterized by limited initial improvement followed by subsequent decline, is associated with poorer prognosis. Serial LVEF monitoring in patients with HFimpEF could help with early identification of at-risk patients.Graphical Abstract

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Fu Wai Hospital (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.