HV interval measure immediately before TAVI with SEV for predicting pacemaker implantation

Abstract Introduction Although improvements, new onset persistent disturbances in electrocardiogram (ECG) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains up to 34% at hospital discharge (1), needing permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) in self-expanding valves (SEV) as high as 15-27% (2,3). In post TAVI scenario, European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend an electrophyisiologic study centered in His-ventricular electrogram (HV) interval measure for assessing risk of progression to high auriculoventricular block (AVB), if abnormal a PPM is indicated (4,5). We aim to predict PPM through basal HV interval measurement prior TAVI with SEV. Furthermore, we aim to compare different current SEV with basal HV interval and the distinct rate of PPM before discharge. Methods and Results Single-center prospective cohort study, patients with severe aortic stenosis scheduled for TAVI, sinus rhythm at intervention day, without PPM or history of PPM indication were included. At time of TAVI, contralateral venous puncture to femoral arterial access was made, a tetrapolar catheter was advanced and placed at the septal aspect of tricuspid valve searching for His electrogram. A mobile polygraph was used to measure ECG parameters and HV interval before TAVI. Then, a tetrapolar catheter was advanced to ventricle to perform rapid stimulation as part of habitual valve implantation protocol. After procedure, we performed rhythm surveillance for at least >48-72 hours and based in electrical evolution one of three decisions was made: 1)PPM implant, 2)late post TAVI HV interval re-measure or 3)clinical daily ECG vigilance, if this last was normal, unchanged from basal or with new but stable conduction disturbances, discharge were indicated following ESC guidelines. A total of 41 patients were enrolled, median age 84±4 years, 24 females (54.5%), PR mean 198±42ms, QRS mean 112±30ms. 18 had a 1st degree AVB (40.9%) of whom 13 (72.5%) had a PR ˂240ms. EPS data showed prior HV interval mean of 55±9ms. A Mild abnormal HV interval (56-69ms) were seen in 21 patients (51.2%), of whom 12 had a narrow QRS. SEV implanted were 11 (25%) Medtronic CoreValve Evolut+, 5 (11.4%) Biosensors Allegra, 25 (56.8%) Abbott Navitor. Post TAVI procedure, 5 (12.2%) women and 8 (19.5%) men met criteria for PPM implantation before discharge. One woman was implanted 6 days after discharge due to high AVB (66ms HV interval prior TAVR). In a multivariate analysis including sex, age, PR, QRS and HV interval >55ms, valve type the RR (IC 95% 1.37-30.99) risk of PPM was 6.52 folds higher (p=0.019). Conclusions An HV interval >55ms before TAVI with SEV increases risk of PPM after TAVI and before hospital discharge. There was no difference in PPM implantation after TAVI between different SEV types in our center.