Relative potential for stand persistence of riparian and upland aspen stands of a semi-arid montane landscape of the Southern Rocky Mountains

Several studies have predicted a loss of quaking aspen ( Populus tremuloides) from many western landscapes, but other studies have suggested that aspen persistence is driven by local site factors. Increased frequency of acute drought has been implicated as an important factor driving overstory mortality and reduced regeneration densities in the region. We investigated the relationship between aspen regeneration and site moisture availability potential using ecosystem type as a proxy. We hypothesized that aspen stands growing along perennial-flowing streams would support higher aspen regeneration densities than upland aspen stands. We compared stand structure, groundcover composition, and regeneration densities of nine riparian aspen stands with nine paired upland aspen stands in the Caribou–Targhee National Forest. Aspen regeneration densities were significantly higher in the riparian aspen stands (845.3 + 318.7 stems ha −1 ) compared to the upland aspen stands (249.1 + 74.1 stems ha −1 ) for regeneration shorter than 1 m ( p = 0.0391). Riparian stands also exhibited significantly higher forb ( p < 0.001) and graminoid ( p < 0.001) cover compared to upland aspen stands, suggesting that riparian sites provided higher site moisture availability. We suggest that riparian areas may provide refugia for aspen in the future considering projections of increased incidence of acute drought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2024-0189
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relative potential for stand persistence of riparian and upland aspen stands of a semi-arid montane landscape of the Southern Rocky Mountains

Daniel M. Kashian, Grant Logan Harley, Eva K. Strand, Benjamin Adam Spei et al.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Forest ecology and management
article

Relative potential for stand persistence of riparian and upland aspen stands of a semi-arid montane landscape of the Southern Rocky Mountains

Daniel M. Kashian, Grant Logan Harley, Eva K. Strand, Benjamin Adam Spei, P. Charles Goebel
article en

Abstract

Several studies have predicted a loss of quaking aspen ( Populus tremuloides) from many western landscapes, but other studies have suggested that aspen persistence is driven by local site factors. Increased frequency of acute drought has been implicated as an important factor driving overstory mortality and reduced regeneration densities in the region. We investigated the relationship between aspen regeneration and site moisture availability potential using ecosystem type as a proxy. We hypothesized that aspen stands growing along perennial-flowing streams would support higher aspen regeneration densities than upland aspen stands. We compared stand structure, groundcover composition, and regeneration densities of nine riparian aspen stands with nine paired upland aspen stands in the Caribou–Targhee National Forest. Aspen regeneration densities were significantly higher in the riparian aspen stands (845.3 + 318.7 stems ha −1 ) compared to the upland aspen stands (249.1 + 74.1 stems ha −1 ) for regeneration shorter than 1 m ( p = 0.0391). Riparian stands also exhibited significantly higher forb ( p < 0.001) and graminoid ( p < 0.001) cover compared to upland aspen stands, suggesting that riparian sites provided higher site moisture availability. We suggest that riparian areas may provide refugia for aspen in the future considering projections of increased incidence of acute drought.

Canadian Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 55
University of Idaho (US), Wayne State University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Forest ecology and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.