Reinterpretation of genetic testing for Cardiomyopathies: Less is more

Abstract Background In the last years, the concept of reinterpretation of genetic testing has been considered as part of the diagnostic workflow. However, this process requires time, expert curators and new pieces of evidence to evaluate, as functional studies, segregation and allele frequency data. Last year, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published new guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. This document includes a precise list of genes associated with the different types of Cardiomyopathies and their level of contribution, according to ClinGen evaluation: definitive/strong, moderate, limited, and refuted/disputed. This document poses a real support in the reinterpretation of tests that report variants in genes not clearly correlated with these phenotypes. Purpose To evaluate the impact of the new ESC indications regarding genetic testing, we reconsidered all genetic results performed in our Clinic in patients with confirmed or suspicious Cardiomyopathy. Methods From 2017 to 2023 we analyzed 296 probands eligible for Cardiomyopathy genetic testing, in particular: 105 patients were tested for Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (ACM), 113 for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) and 78 for Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM), using a custom sequencing panel including 44 genes (11 genes for ACM, 34 for DCM and 29 for HCM). Results Comparison analysis with the genes reported from the ESC guidelines, considering only the definitive, moderate, and strong genes, showed that 24 genes are not more associated with the phenotype and then not clinically actionable. In this scenario, we reconsidered 12 variants (8%), previously classified as VUS, changing the referral status of 8 patients, from uncertain to negative. Conclusions These results highlight the importance of variant reinterpretation as a fundamental step of genetic testing, posing the importance of the selection of the genes to analyze, in order to improve the management of the patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3790
Primary Topic
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reinterpretation of genetic testing for Cardiomyopathies: Less is more

Martina Manzoni, Elena Sommariva, Valeria Novelli, Alessandra Volpe et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
article

Reinterpretation of genetic testing for Cardiomyopathies: Less is more

Martina Manzoni, Elena Sommariva, Valeria Novelli, Alessandra Volpe, Stefania Farina, Saima Mushtaq, Francesca Pizzamiglio, Giorgia Bonalumi, M L Biondi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In the last years, the concept of reinterpretation of genetic testing has been considered as part of the diagnostic workflow. However, this process requires time, expert curators and new pieces of evidence to evaluate, as functional studies, segregation and allele frequency data. Last year, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published new guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. This document includes a precise list of genes associated with the different types of Cardiomyopathies and their level of contribution, according to ClinGen evaluation: definitive/strong, moderate, limited, and refuted/disputed. This document poses a real support in the reinterpretation of tests that report variants in genes not clearly correlated with these phenotypes. Purpose To evaluate the impact of the new ESC indications regarding genetic testing, we reconsidered all genetic results performed in our Clinic in patients with confirmed or suspicious Cardiomyopathy. Methods From 2017 to 2023 we analyzed 296 probands eligible for Cardiomyopathy genetic testing, in particular: 105 patients were tested for Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (ACM), 113 for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) and 78 for Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM), using a custom sequencing panel including 44 genes (11 genes for ACM, 34 for DCM and 29 for HCM). Results Comparison analysis with the genes reported from the ESC guidelines, considering only the definitive, moderate, and strong genes, showed that 24 genes are not more associated with the phenotype and then not clinically actionable. In this scenario, we reconsidered 12 variants (8%), previously classified as VUS, changing the referral status of 8 patients, from uncertain to negative. Conclusions These results highlight the importance of variant reinterpretation as a fundamental step of genetic testing, posing the importance of the selection of the genes to analyze, in order to improve the management of the patients.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Centro Cardiologico Monzino (IT), Mylan (Switzerland) (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.