Sinus rhythm maintenance and the changes of echocardiographic parameters in patients with late persistent atrial fibrillation at 6 months after direct current cardioversion

Abstract Background Late persistent non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), with a duration of its episode ≥90 days and up to 12 months, is considered a distinct persistent AF entity, which might possess substantial differences as compared to its early persistent pattern (up to 3 months) in terms of myocardial remodeling and its reversibility after cardioversion. Purpose To study the changes of echocardiographic parameters in patients with non-valvular late persistent AF with respect to sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance at 6 months after successful direct current cardioversion (DCCV). Methods The cohort single-center study enrolled 59 late persistent AF patients, who underwent a successful elective DCCV. At 6-months follow-up, patients were subdivided into the groups regarding SR maintenance: 32 (54 %%) patients with a maintained SR (G1), and 27 (46 %) patients with a failure to maintain SR (G2). The parameters of myocardial remodeling and function were evaluated by transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) baseline (by TTE and TEE) and at 6-months follow-up (by TTE). Results TTE data from G1 patients, in contrast to G2, suggested better baseline status of left heart chambers, particularly the lower diameter of left atrium (LA), left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and higher LV systolic function (by LV ejection fraction [EF]). According to the TEE data, G2 (vs. G1) was characterized by more prevalent cases of LA spontaneous (echo) contrast (41 % vs. 15 %, respectively; p=0,042) and LA appendage flow velocity ≤40 cm/s (82 % vs. 53 %, respectively; p=0,022). At 6-months follow-up TTE, G1 patients, as opposed to G2, demonstrated a better profile of echocardiographic parameters, namely a lower LA diameter, LA and right atrium (RA) volumes, along with less advanced LV remodeling and higher LV EF. TTE data from G1 at 6-months follow-up after DCCV suggested the reverse remodeling of both atria, namely the decrease of LA diameter, LA volume and its index (Fig. 1), as well as RA volume and its index. Moreover, G2 demonstrated a decline in LV systolic function, in particular the rise of LV end-systolic volume and decrease of LV EF (Fig. 2), as compared to G1. Furthermore, at 6-months follow-up, G2 patients presented with more advanced severity of PH and tricuspid regurgitation, in comparison with G1. Conclusions Late persistent AF patients with a SR maintenance at 6-months follow-up after successful DCCV presented a better baseline profile of myocardial remodeling and systolic function. The SR maintenance at 6-months follow-up after DCCV was associated with the reverse remodeling of left heart chambers (LA and LV) and RA. On the contrary, a failure to maintain SR in late persistent AF patients was associated with a deterioration in LV systolic function, and more advanced PH and tricuspid regurgitation.