Strategy optimization for the combined procedure of left atrial appendage occlusion plus catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (COMBINATION): a multi-center, randomized study

Abstract Background The long-term efficacy and safety of combining left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) plus catheter ablation (CA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a single procedure have been established. However, the optimal combining strategy has not been well elucidated. Objective To determine the impact of different combining strategies on long-term clinical outcomes. Methods In this prospective multicenter study, patients with non-valvular AF referred for the combining procedure were randomly assigned to the ablation-first or occlusion-first groups at a 1:1 ratio. We evaluated the outcomes of LAAC with a Watchman device and CA using a contact-force sensing catheter during long-term follow-up. Results Of the 202 randomized patients, 194(96.0%) completed the trial with 97 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. All procedures were accomplished with acute successful LAAC and restoration of sinus rhythm. Incidences of periprocedural complications were similar. Higher chronic peri-device leak (PDL, 15.5% vs 5.2%, P=0.031) and device-related thrombus (DRT, 8.2% vs 1.0%, P=0.035) rates were observed in the ablation-first group. The event-free survival rate of the primary endpoint (composite of stroke/transient ischemic attack, thromboembolism, clinically-relevant bleeding, cardiovascular rehospitalization/death) was significantly higher in the occlusion-first group (83.5% vs 71.1%, log-rank P=0.036, HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.29-0.95) during a median 2.5-year follow-up. Patients with male gender and higher CHA2DS2-VASc score were at lower risk in the subgroup analysis. Long-term freedoms from AF (77.3% vs 63.5%, log-rank P=0.039) and atrial tachyarrhythmias (70.1% vs 55.7%, log-rank P=0.044) were higher in the occlusion-first group, respectively. Conclusions The occlusion-first approach is recommended for combined procedures where a plug-like device is implanted due to its superior long-term clinical benefits.Flowchart of the COMBINATION trialIncidences of primary endpoint

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.509
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategy optimization for the combined procedure of left atrial appendage occlusion plus catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (COMBINATION): a multi-center, randomized study

Bo Yang, Yingxin Zhao, Zhongbao Ruan, Peng Ye et al.
European Heart Journal
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Strategy optimization for the combined procedure of left atrial appendage occlusion plus catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (COMBINATION): a multi-center, randomized study

Bo Yang, Yingxin Zhao, Zhongbao Ruan, Peng Ye, Hui‐Ling Lai, Shuman Tao, Huimin Chu, Jiuqing Zhong, Jun Li, Y D Li, Qian Chen, Jianwen Liang, Xin Du, Xiufeng Zhou, Rui Xie
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The long-term efficacy and safety of combining left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) plus catheter ablation (CA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a single procedure have been established. However, the optimal combining strategy has not been well elucidated. Objective To determine the impact of different combining strategies on long-term clinical outcomes. Methods In this prospective multicenter study, patients with non-valvular AF referred for the combining procedure were randomly assigned to the ablation-first or occlusion-first groups at a 1:1 ratio. We evaluated the outcomes of LAAC with a Watchman device and CA using a contact-force sensing catheter during long-term follow-up. Results Of the 202 randomized patients, 194(96.0%) completed the trial with 97 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. All procedures were accomplished with acute successful LAAC and restoration of sinus rhythm. Incidences of periprocedural complications were similar. Higher chronic peri-device leak (PDL, 15.5% vs 5.2%, P=0.031) and device-related thrombus (DRT, 8.2% vs 1.0%, P=0.035) rates were observed in the ablation-first group. The event-free survival rate of the primary endpoint (composite of stroke/transient ischemic attack, thromboembolism, clinically-relevant bleeding, cardiovascular rehospitalization/death) was significantly higher in the occlusion-first group (83.5% vs 71.1%, log-rank P=0.036, HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.29-0.95) during a median 2.5-year follow-up. Patients with male gender and higher CHA2DS2-VASc score were at lower risk in the subgroup analysis. Long-term freedoms from AF (77.3% vs 63.5%, log-rank P=0.039) and atrial tachyarrhythmias (70.1% vs 55.7%, log-rank P=0.044) were higher in the occlusion-first group, respectively. Conclusions The occlusion-first approach is recommended for combined procedures where a plug-like device is implanted due to its superior long-term clinical benefits.Flowchart of the COMBINATION trialIncidences of primary endpoint

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Ningbo University (CN), Hebei Medical University (CN), Nanchang University (CN), Xinjiang Medical University (CN), Nantong University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (CN), Yuhuangding Hospital (CN), Second People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (CN), Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN), The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN), Shanghai East Hospital (CN), Foshan Second People's Hospital (CN), Central Hospital of Wuhan (CN), Zhengzhou People's Hospital (CN), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.