Advanced mapping and ablation technologies to target pulmonary veins gaps and residual antral potentials during repeat paroxysmal AF ablation: acute and long-term follow-up

Abstract Background A comprehensive understanding of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection and residual potentials (RAP) within the antral scar during repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, facilitated by advanced mapping and ablation technologies, is currently lacking. Optimizing radiofrequency (RF) deliveries after failed PV isolation (PVI) may enhance ablation efficiency. Purpose This study aims to assess both the acute and long-term outcomes focusing on PV gaps (PVGs) and RAPs, utilizing advanced mapping and ablation technologies during repeat PV ablation in patients (pts) with paroxysmal AF. Methods Repeat AF-CHARISMA study, a prospective, single-arm cohort study, included consecutive pts from 13 centers undergoing repeat ablation of paroxysmal AF. The Lumipoint (Boston Scientific) map-analysis tool was used sequentially on each PV component. All patients were followed-up for at least 12 months after the procedure. The ablation endpoint was PVI and electrical quiescence in the antral region. Long-term outcome was the recurrence of AT/AF over follow-up. Results One-hundred pts were included (69% after failed RF procedure, 31% after failed cryoablation procedure). A total of 276 PVGs (192 after RF ablation, 2.8±1.8/pt; 84 after cryoablation, 2.7±1.9/pt, p=0.665 vs RF) and 44 RAPs (43 after RF ablation, 0.6±1.1/pt; 1 after cryoablation, 0.03±0.2/pt, p=0.002 vs RF) were detected. In the majority of cases (75%), only PVGs were present whereas, in 21%, both PVGs and RAPs were detected (2 pts had only RAPs). In 2 pts no PVG nor RAP were identified. PVGs were most common at anterior sites (103, 37.3%), followed by posterior sites (75, 27.2%) and carina sites (49, 17.8%). PVG location sites did not differ between prior ablation approach. Only 1 pt after cryoablation showed a RAP (at carina site), whereas the 44 RAPs after RF were fairly distributed across different sites. Acute procedural success was 100%, with all PVs successfully isolated and RAPs completely abolished in all study pts. After the blanking period, over a follow-up of 480±211 days, 18 pts (18%) suffered an AT/AF recurrence (time to recurrence: 245±80 days). Previous ablation approach (HR=0.66, 95%CI: 0.2 to 2.0 for previous cryoablation, p=0.46), number of PVGs (1.05, 0.8 to 1.3, p=0.67) or number of RAPs (0.41, 0.1 to 1.2, p=0.12) were not associated to AT/AF recurrence. No major complications or adverse events occurred. Conclusion A structured ablation workflow for repeat catheter ablation, incorporating consistent high-density mapping and improved diagnostic tools to guide the procedure, demonstrated safety and efficacy in treating paroxysmal AF irrespectively of previous ablation approach. Residual potentials within the antral scar were more frequently detected after RF ablation compared to cryoablation.