Impact of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation on cardiac sympathetic nervous system: a prospective stratified randomized comparative study in patients with and without heart failure

Abstract Background Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) might influence the cardiac sympathetic nervous system (CSNS). We sought to investigate the impact of AF ablation with 2nd generation cryoballoon catheter (CB) and contact force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter (RF) on CSNS and the association of this effect with early AF recurrence in patients with and without heart failure (HF), using cardiac iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. Methods and Results One hundred sixty-five paroxysmal AF patients who were scheduled for ablation were enrolled. All patients were categorized into two groups: one with HF (n=31), defined as left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% or previous history of hospitalization for worsening HF, and the other without HF (n=134). They were then randomly assigned to CB (17 patients with HF and 68 without HF) or RF (14 with HF and 66 without HF). MIBG scintigraphy was performed at baseline and 3 months post-ablation and the washout rate (WR) was measured. There were no significant changes in WR from baseline to 3 months after RF and CB ablation (28.7±18.6% to 27.9±16.7% in RF and 29.4±16.7% to 30.5±16.4% in CB). WR decreased more in patients with HF at 3 months after ablation than without HF, while WR significantly increased in patients without HF and there was a significant interaction in WR change between with or without HF (interaction p<0.001). WR change from the baseline to 3 months after ablation (dWR) was not significantly different between CB and RF, irrespectively of the HF presence. In the blanking period of 3 months after ablation, early AF recurrence (EAR) was observed in 37 (22%) patients with no antiarrhythmic drugs (17(21%) patients in RF and 20(24%) in CB). dWR was significantly greater in patients with than without EAR (4.0±14.1% vs -0.9±11.0%, p=0.027). Higher dWR (≥ 6.9% (AUC 0.644, 95%CI [0.535-0.753]) by ROC curve analysis) was independently associated with EAR (adjusted odds ratio = 4.15, 95%CI [1.87-9.22], p<0.001, adjusted for age, sex, and left atrial diameter). Conclusions Irrespectively of CB and RF, AF ablation might reduce adrenergic tone in patients with HF, while it might induce more adrenergic tone in patients without HF. Excessive adrenergic tone might be associated with early AF recurrence.WR changes before and after ablationdWR in patients with or without HF